Strain with 36% level OF THC??? IS THIS POSSIBLE?

So this means that OP may be a cop trying to get dumb asses to click on the link in order to drop a root kit on thier PCs?
LOL
this is why I read the thread B4 clicking on links, sleep well guys

JohnnyTHCeeds said:

Here is the Juice.

There is a strange company out there called BC Seeds (Canadian company, named, BC Seeds) These guy claim to have several strains that top out just below 55% THC.

Upon going to this site my computer's security system went berserk. It flagged several security issues including some invasive third site attempts to gain access to my system.

My guess is that this is a government sting. These guys are claiming to carry strains that are more than half THC by weight content. this plant would have to be like a gumi bear. Some hash does not have this level of THC.

The application to get into this site requests information they do not need!

The various seeds are priced at close to $1000 per seed, 10 pack minimum. If these are for real wait and some one will be selling F2's or F3's soon.

Click to expand...

First off, JohnnyTHCeeds is mostly correct.
Secondly, you are all literally 5 years too late on these BS artists, proven fakes.
Wow, I can't believe nobody goggled this one.
http://forum.grasscity.com/indoor-medical-marijuana-growing/304518-elephant-bud-bc-seeds-worlds-strongest-bud.html

I'm growing a Tathumkamun right now, sprouted Thanksgiving day.

Hey all you brain surgery experts....

33% Of What?

10% is BS.... 20% bull...

What is the THC a percentage of?

% Of the Bud... NO.... that would be like -= .00020%
% of the plant ... No that would be like=.000030%

THC listed % is a % of what....

The concept of listing % of THC is all BS...

The THC content is = to what 30% part of what?

Listing the plants potential THC content is a bull shit lie that should not be repeated [that make you a liar]...

So what is the % a % of?

Yes I understand your confusion
Often we say %thc to represent total cannabinoids...for example blast 10 grams with butane, receiving 3 grams would be 30% by weight and that is quite high but I have seen AVERAGES of 27% with some of our members, 20% is common after winterizing...

Now when you take that product to get tested they will say yo that 3 grams is 70%thca and x%thc and cbn etc etc
These ratios/% determine the type of high

The first % tells you how much of that (ratio of cannabinoids) there is by weight.......

I'm sorry you don't understand but that does not mean it is a "BS lie"....the numbers are very helpful to someone who can read it and understand

And yes 33% thc as a ratio is believable

Percentage of THC will not tell you what type of high you will get. Just because there's a high percent of THC doesn't mean that it's real stoney bud. It's the mixture of the different cannibanoids, combined in different percentages that make up the profile of the high. Some of the most popular and supposably strongest strains are no more than 10%THC. Bottom line just because your bud tests out with a high percent of THC doesn't necessarily mean its going to give you a strong high. There are many other variables that make up what type of high to will experience. On top of all this everybody's chemistry is different so the many different active substances in cannabis will affect each individual differently. I've done alot of reading/research pertaining to this, most of this we are just now starting to understand, and sorry I don't have all the references but if you are interested try Googling all about THC testing. THC percentage testing will not tell you how strong your high will be- period. Take those tests with a big grain of salt. Flaming can begin!

Testing shows all terpenes and ratios of ALL cannabinoids...definitely shows what type of high lol
Nobody said high thc % was desired. Because certain cannabinoids fight for the same receptors you want to understand how all interact thcv rhc cbg cbc cbnd and thc isn't just thc there are many isomers with different potencies and effects..all these compounds effect onset times and duration of the high as well as all qualities
Sooooooo....wtf are you talking about lol

qwizoking said:

Testing shows all terpenes and ratios of ALL cannabinoids...definitely shows what type of high lol
Nobody said high thc % was desired. Because certain cannabinoids fight for the same receptors you want to understand how all interact thcv rhc cbg cbc cbnd and thc isn't just thc there are many isomers with different potencies and effects..all these compounds effect onset times and duration of the high as well as all qualities
Sooooooo....wtf are you talking about lol

Click to expand...

So you can look at testing results and know what type of high each individual will get from that pecticular strain? If so, you are a wizard. Also have all the terpenes and all the cannabinoids been fully identified? I don't think so. We are still finding out about new properties of these cannabinoids. We are far from knowing how cannabis affects all individuals.
Qwiso, I do respect your opinion but I must disagree with you on this. There is no way you can predict what type of high an individual will get according to today's methods of testing.

"So you can look at testing results and know what type of high each individual will get from that pecticular strain? If so, you are a wizard. Also have all the terpenes and all the cannabinoids been fully identified?"

Yes and yes......hplc makes that last part really easy
Lol I prefer king over wizard.......hehe jk

But seriously the terpenes are not unique to cannabis and have been studied..we can produce the cannabinoids synthetically and test them as well.. we know binding efficiencies and half lives and the interactions etc etc.....but that is how I make a living

What about categorizing highs? People explain their highs in different ways, most very vague. So lab techs make up a "check which box pertains" type of worksheet for their testers'? Highs are exclusive to individuals, just like pharmaceuticals affect different people in different ways. Then there's the aspect of side effects. Different people have different reactions, same goes for cannnabis. I know people that will smoke a certain strain and be out- couch lock, others will smoke the same strain and be energetic. How could anyone possibly predict this, especially by using a THC test?
As you can tell I'm still very skeptical about these THC tests. I dont think these tests can accurately predict how a cannabis plant will effect the user. I've smoked buds tested out at very high THC levels and very low levels, lots of them are very deceiving; meaning I've gotten just as high from low THC buds as from some of the highest tested cannabis. This is far from an exact science, were still learning as we go, but were nowhere near where we need to be.

Everyone reacts differently..but let's not exaggerate the effects.. I don't know many people that would say epinephrine makes them fall asleep..same with side effects, pain pills make all constipated..of course there are slight variations but overall yea you can predict exactly..they all react to receptors in the same way so in any case we can theoretically predict by studying mode of action the pharmacokinetics. We can theoretically predict how your body will react to a t.....but of course there are slight variations, not enough to alter the type of high

Cbd creates the ceiling. Even a sativa with low thc will get you very high if you keep smoking..because it lacks cannabinoids that fight for the same receptor..

Actually there are some very exaggerated side effects. People that take "uppers" that give the opposite effect. I've known several that would do cocaine and it would make them tried. What about the drug Ritalin (spelling?) used to calm down hyper people, but when taken by others, it acts like an upper. There are many other examples. You might have a better scientific background than myself but from my experiences, very extensive, I have to disagree with you. Today's THC testing is not an accurate way to determine how powerful or how good your buds are. It's a start and maybe a very broad guideline at best. Thank you for your input and feel free to enlighten us more; my opinions can be changed.

How can we completely understand the psychoactive properties of cannabis when we haven't even been able to understand what all the different cannabinoids actually do and how they effect humans?

Amphetamines make you focused
I have adhd and was prescribed adderall..while it focuses your mind it does not cause a lack of energy, this same "focus" is what causes a meth head to clean all day..it doesn't actually make them less hyper but controls it

Cocaine may make someone on this earth tired but I've never met them and I've seen plenty of od's to know they all died/suffered from a stimulant overdose

You don't have to believe it because perhaps you don't fully understand how the cannabinoids work and effect you (no offense intended) but there are those who do...and they do effect most people in pretty much the exact same way as with all medications

I think its also important to remember most of the effects from thc in particular are biphasic


"when we haven't even been able to understand what all the different cannabinoids actually do and how they effect humans?"
Well we do for the most part.....we've been studying cbd for 4 decades for example..for whatever reason a bunch of morons heard about Gupta and it started a craze..most of the cannabinoid talk is like this..gupta..I could rant about him awhile...sorry off topic

I guess it has alot to do with what individual people think of as being high/stoned, etc. and what people are looking for in their high. I just don't believe that today's THC tests can accurately tell us how strong or good the high will be. I've personally experienced this numerous times. A friend used to get buds from a dispensary that tested and labeled all products with THC%. The highs from tested buds did not match up to their THC% numbers. Some of the lowest THC buds produced a much more intense and longer lasting buzz than some of the highest THC% buds. I'm not alone with this, many people I know have repeated the same thing. These THC tests can be very misleading and I don't know anyone who can read a testing profile and accurately predict what kind, how strong, and how long a high will be, with the possible exception of yourself. So are you saying (and I'm not trying to be disrespectful) that if I had a better scientific understanding of terpenes and cannabinoids, I could look at a cannabinoid profile from a THC test and tell accurately how strong it would affect me, what type of feeling I would get from the high, and for how long? And out of curiosity , do you have your cannabis products tested and do you consume and or purchase according to the results of a THC test?

I had posted earlier in the thread that I figured THC alone wasn't the only thing getting you high, it's a combination of many things. As has been pointed out correctly, we don't know enough about this yet.

I figured getting a King Tut advertised at 33% TCH was a good way to hedge my bets though. When I have it tested, even if I only come in at say 27%, I will have an impressive looking lab ticket to go with my pretty jar of weed when I go to the dispensary with it.

Was just reading about the suspicious and questionable Euphoria unlimited stain from bc seeds that is said to be 36% and something special but untill I see video smoke reports I don't believe it. Quantum Kush from TGA tested at 30.6 http://www.tgagenetics.com/images/stories/lab_results/quantum_kush.pdf and even their mickey kush tested at 28.6 Timewreck is not far below. Y Griega supposedly tested at 27.12% and Sincity seeds claims to use a 28+% Kosher Kush from Reserva Privada seeds.

I think something important to consider is that THC levels are not everything when it comes to a high, and even though some bud is great when you first smoke it, it may lack longterm high type appeal.

I'm still chasing an elusive high from the late 90's. Was just called "kind bud" which as far as I know was never a strain name. The bud smelled sweet and amazing, was a great kind of fluffy and sent me into a super happy euphoric dream state for a whole weekend. I've never come close to this high again with Sour Diesel which is all they sell as "qualiy" around me. Sour diesel sure gets me high, but it's a shitty high that lacks a lot imo. The bud might have been bubblegum.

I have read that some malawi has a special physcedelc high and so does Belladona. Hawaiian Snow Is supposed to be special too.

Why does typig in this forum skip letters and lag out while typing? It's really annoying. Watch me type that without corrections. <--Why dos typingn this forum skp letter and lag out while yping? It's realynnoyng. Whch me tpe that wiout correctio

I recently viewed a DEA seizure report on Thai Stick. The highpoint of the THC content was about 12% THC and that point was hit in the mid 70's. (That's when I first tried it)

You will find what you are looking for in the sativa line. Ladrace strains are your best bet. Pure sativa is a psychedelic high and Malawi is one of the best. In Africa it is known as Banana Bud because it is often sold wrapped in banana leaves. The tribal guys call it Elephant Killer. My guess is, if an elephant ate a plant with 10 pounds of bud, well, they might sleep a couple of days.

i heard there is something at 45% thc?