The Democratic Party Autopsy Report

Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
PCXV said:
Because psychoanalysis is equivalent to a road everyone has to share. Your ideas are simple to comprehend, but they are also easy to poke holes in.

I was just pointing out what a good complicit slave you are. How do you justify paying taxes, assuming you do? Is it straight up fear or do you see any merit in the prosperity the current system has afforded?
Click to expand...
It is not up to the victim of a crime to justify complying with the criminal if they are placed in danger for failing to comply. Would you ask a rape victim a similar question?

A slave ? Me? That's really funny, but NO. A slave believes his master has a right to do what he does, that would be you.

Merit? So, you are saying it's okay to initiate aggression against people who aren't aggressing against you, if there is profit in it? I hope your neighbors lock their doors when you are prowling the streets.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Unclebaldrick said:
Rob Roy is one big moot point; over and over and over again.
Click to expand...

Yes, I've modeled my arguments after the Government school system, in the repetition aspect, but not in the content. My arguments do not rely on systemic contradiction.

Perhaps you could refute some of my arguments with your keen potato fueled intellect?
 
SunnyJim

SunnyJim

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
If you have to conflate the other persons argument in order to refute it, you're not doing it right.

I don't believe in a collective superiority of one race over another. I believe every individual has or should have equal rights of self determination over their own body and their own property. You do not. You asked for examples of where you were being willfully ignorant. Your claim that I believe in a collective racial superiority is an instance of your being willfully ignorant.

Government CAN'T hold certain rights over people, any greater than an individual person can, as government is only made up of people. The sum of a thing cannot exceed the sum of the component parts comprising it.
Therefore if no person has any right to force you to serve them or associate with them, they could not get with other people and aggregate that nonright or "zero right" into a positive sum when they attempt to create a faith based thing called "government". To fail to admit this, is an illogical math error on your part. Go ahead and refute it, if you can.

Of course you probably won't address what I just said.

No you are not in favor of equal rights. Equal rights can't mean one person or group of persons can initiate a human interaction with a neutral peaceable person against the wishes of the neutral peaceable person. That would mean the neutral peaceable person has less right than the person(s) initiating the unwanted relationship, since they are unable to decline the wishes of the aggressing party. The same goes in the flip side Jim Crow law situation, wherein people who mutually wanted to associate were prevented from associating by a third party (government worshipping people), which means they were deprived of their rights of self determination.

The rest of your post is an attempt to personally malign me in an attempt to redirect the argument. Nice try.
Click to expand...
The delicious irony of being told I'm ignorant by someone completely bereft of intellect..

The rest of your post is repetition. Your 'mathematical analysis' of the illegitimacy of government has been refuted several times. You've waited your customary few days before regurgitating it back up again. Classic Rob Roy, weak and transparent debating tactics. You're clean out of ideas.

There is no 'neutrality' in denying service to a black person. There is no 'neutrality' in a pedophile grooming a child and sexually abusing them. You are not opposed to either. Sick.

Mercifully, you lack the qualifications or the following to have your ideology validated by anyone other than a racist/sex offender/bigot. You are primitive. Go ahead and refute that if you can.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
SunnyJim said:
The delicious irony of being told I'm ignorant by someone completely bereft of intellect..

The rest of your post is repetition. Your 'mathematical analysis' of the illegitimacy of government has been refuted several times. You've waited your customary few days before regurgitating it back up again. Classic Rob Roy, weak and transparent debating tactics. You're clean out of ideas.

There is no 'neutrality' in denying service to a black person. There is no 'neutrality' in a pedophile grooming a child and sexually abusing them. You are not opposed to either. Sick.

Mercifully, you lack the qualifications or the following to have your ideology validated by anyone other than a racist/sex offender/bigot. You are primitive. Go ahead and refute that if you can.
Click to expand...

I will address your post in a bit, perhaps this evening. I have to go and do some volunteer work now.

I notice you have claimed my argument has been refuted, but I haven't SEEN a concise refutation.

So, you are okay, at least in some instances, with a white person forcing a black person who remains on his own property to serve the white person against his will? Sounds primitive to me.
 
SunnyJim

SunnyJim

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
I will address your post in a bit, perhaps this evening.
Click to expand...
Don't bother. You'll simply be repeating your tired, hypocritical, half-witted, and debunked ideology.

Everyone here acknowledges your supporting of an 'individual's right to discriminate and deny service based on race/ethnicity/... without the threat of governmental interference'. The overt bigotry in your posts here is only validated by a couple other racist members. Fortunately for the rest of us, you're part of the uncivilized, poorly-educated, divisive, and dwindling minority.
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
That's a really bad answer which doesn't address my question. It implies you dislike free riders, but then in the next sentence you cheerlead the free rider aspect. Could you please decide which side of your mouth you are speaking out of before you engage your tongue? A nation of idiots? Oh dear.
Click to expand...
you sent 3 children of your own to public schooling. You yourself are a product of public schooling. Now that you own property you complain about paying for a service that you and family have used.
Please STFU or share how you will be filing this tax season.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
SunnyJim said:
Don't bother. You'll simply be repeating your tired, hypocritical, half-witted, and debunked ideology.

Everyone here acknowledges your supporting of an 'individual's right to discriminate and deny service based on race/ethnicity/... without the threat of governmental interference'. The overt bigotry in your posts here is only validated by a couple other racist members. Fortunately for the rest of us, you're part of the uncivilized, poorly-educated, divisive, and dwindling minority.
Click to expand...

I didn't think you could answer my questions.

So you WOULD force a black person to serve a white person against the black persons will?
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
you sent 3 children of your own to public schooling. You yourself are a product of public schooling. Now that you own property you complain about paying for a service that you and family have used.
Please STFU or share how you will be filing this tax season.
Click to expand...
That doesn't answer my question though. Why do you think it is okay to steal a persons house if they don't share your ideas ?
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
SunnyJim said:
The delicious irony of being told I'm ignorant by someone completely bereft of intellect..

The rest of your post is repetition. Your 'mathematical analysis' of the illegitimacy of government has been refuted several times. You've waited your customary few days before regurgitating it back up again. Classic Rob Roy, weak and transparent debating tactics. You're clean out of ideas.

There is no 'neutrality' in denying service to a black person. There is no 'neutrality' in a pedophile grooming a child and sexually abusing them. You are not opposed to either. Sick.

Mercifully, you lack the qualifications or the following to have your ideology validated by anyone other than a racist/sex offender/bigot. You are primitive. Go ahead and refute that if you can.
Click to expand...

I didn't think you could stay on topic or answer my questions. It's a pity, in a room full of dull people you could pass for a smart guy.

Your ideas center on the idea that a forced involuntary human interaction is okay. ,Mine center on the idea that human interactions should begin on a mutual and consensual basis or they shouldn't happen. So, WHO is the primitive one ?
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
When you answer my question on how you file your income tax, I just may very well answer your question. Until then lets just talk about how you sent 3 or your children to public school and now bitches about paying his share.
Click to expand...

Okay let's talk. Do you admit that government schools are funded thru a forcibly imposed confiscatory tax system?
 
see4

see4

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
I didn't think you could stay on topic or answer my questions. It's a pity, in a room full of dull people you could pass for a smart guy.

Your ideas center on the idea that a forced involuntary human interaction is okay. ,Mine center on the idea that human interactions should begin on a mutual and consensual basis or they shouldn't happen. So, WHO is the primitive one ?
Click to expand...
You are. And you literally explained why in your previous statement right before the one in which you posed the question. Literally.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
see4 said:
You are. And you literally explained why in your previous statement right before the one in which you posed the question. Literally.
Click to expand...
So you are okay with forcing people to interact with you when they don't want to, even if they are willing to leave you alone if you leave them alone ? Then you call me primitive ?

So would you be willing to force a black person to use his body to serve you on his own property if he specifically didn't want you there? Let me guess, your Great Grand Daddy had a Plantation called "Candy Land" ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top