The Junk Drawer

OldMedUser

Well-Known Member
Majorities of Americans believe in ghosts, aliens, the devil: Survey
Majorities of Americans believe in aliens, ghosts and the devil, according to a recent RealClear Opinion Research poll.

Among those surveyed, 56.9 percent said they believe in aliens, 61.4 percent believe in ghosts, and 70.3 percent say they believe in the devil, which is lower than the 85.4 percent who say they believe in God.

Other findings in the poll include 80.3 percent of respondents saying that they believe “Jesus is God or the Son of God” and 84.7 percent saying they believe in Heaven.

Another 83 percent say the believe in miracles, though majorities reject the existence of witches and reincarnation. Some 52.3 percent say they don’t believe in reincarnation, and 54.2 percent say the same about witches.

More than 70 percent of Americans believe in hell.

“Self-reported belief in God is highest in the South, at 89%, followed by the Midwest (85%), Northeast (83%), and West (81%),” said RealClear’s Spencer Kimball.

The high belief in spiritual topics appears to be in line with a recent survey from the Pew Research Center in which 7 out of 10 adults said they were “spiritual in some way.”

In the new RealClear poll, respondents were also asked, “If there is a God, do you think of God as male or female or neither?” Precisely half said male, 14.1 percent said female, 27.5 percent responded “something else” and 8.4 percent said they do not believe in God.

The RealClear survey was conducted between Dec. 19 and 21, featuring responses from 1,000 U.S. residents and has a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.
I'd like to see that poll run in Canada to see if we're as gullible as those people.

Not sure I'd bet we weren't.

:peace:
 

Sativied

Well-Known Member
I'd like to see that poll run in Canada to see if we're as gullible as those people.

Not sure I'd bet we weren't.

:peace:
Plenty of similar ones available:

"According to a survey [...], 71 per cent of Canadians (60 per cent of British Columbians) believe in life in the great beyond, 27 per cent (21 per cent in B.C.) believe in reincarnation and 49 per cent (44 per cent in B.C.) think hell is for real."

So 27% thinks they'll come back as a bird or something?

Ok now I'm curious:

"53% of the Dutch population believe in a form of life after death, of which a third believe in some kind of heaven (with or without a god), but with only 4% believing in Hell." "Only 13 per cent of Dutch Catholics believe in heaven, 17% in a personal God..."

Well that's 'enlightening'.

65y15l76qgh91.jpg

I bet percentages of judgementalism are similar. It's not like they fear hell for themselves. It's more like do what my god says else you'll burn for eternity.
 

Sativied

Well-Known Member

Also called on his supporters to gather at his house at the time he had to report himself to prison. He's gone. Which is better than in his house cause that could have gotten messy. Still no justice for the victims' family.
 
Last edited:

OldMedUser

Well-Known Member
Cough, Wendigo, cough.
Point?

Native creation stories make more sense to me than our judeo-christian fantasies and don't come with all the guilt tripping, control freak, follow us or rot in hell penalties they use to brain wash our kids and the native communities who mainly have fallen for our BS.

:peace:
 

printer

Well-Known Member
Federal scientists conclude there is credible evidence for certain medical uses of marijuana
The Department of Health and Human Services concluded that marijuana is less harmful than other dangerous drugs and that there is some evidence of its medical benefits in recommending loosening federal restrictions on the drug.
The agency on Friday released a 252-page review outlining the reasoning that the Food and Drug Administration used to come to this conclusion. It states that that “there exists some credible scientific support for the medical use of marijuana in at least one of the indications for which there is widespread current experience in the United States.”

This and the other findings of the review are a major departure in how the federal government views cannabis. For the last 60-plus years, cannabis has been classified as a Schedule I drug — the same as heroin — under the Controlled Substances Act, which means it’s a substance of high abuse potential and no accepted medical use.

The review was conducted at the request of President Joe Biden, who instructed HHS in an executive order issued in October 2022 to look through all available research on cannabis and recommend if the drug should be moved within the list of federally controlled drugs or removed from it altogether. Bloomberg first reported in August that HHS had recommended marijuana be moved to Schedule III, and the release of these documents on Friday confirms that. The Drug Enforcement Administration will have the final say in any changes to marijuana’s classification under federal law, with a decision expected in the coming months.

The documents were released to cannabis lawyers Matt Zorn and Shane Pennington and published on their blog On Drugs. The documents were released as a result of a lawsuit brought by Zorn and Pennington. Cannabis legalization has spread rapidly across the country over the last decade. Two dozen states — representing more than half the U.S population — have legalized possession and use for adults, while 38 states have established medical marijuana programs. The cannabis review was based on eight different scientific criteria, including its potential for abuse, the state of current scientific knowledge and the likelihood of psychological or physiological dependence.

While there are dozens of medical conditions people use cannabis for, the FDA looked at seven: anorexia, anxiety, epilepsy, inflammatory bowel disease, nausea and vomiting, pain and post-traumatic stress disorder. The review “identified mixed findings of effectiveness across indications.” Some data was inconclusive, some was favorable, and the “largest evidence base for effectiveness exists for marijuana use within the pain indication (in particular, neuropathic pain).” That’s a big change because marijuana’s position in Schedule I indicated that the federal government believes there is no indication of medical use for marijuana — and this review unequivocally counters that.

The FDA also determined that the public health risk and potential for abuse are lower than other scheduled drugs. The FDA’s review concluded that while 10 percent of substance use disorder admissions in 2020 were for marijuana, the risk is much lower than other dangerous drugs like heroin and cocaine. They decided this after going through numerous databases that keep track of ER visits, overdose deaths, hospitalizations and more.
Similarly, they found that cannabis use disorder — which is defined as psychological dependence — ranges from 10 to 20 percent in people who regularly use cannabis. That’s lower than tobacco, opiates and alcohol.

Up to 40 to 50 percent of people who use marijuana regularly can also experience physical dependence, but the FDA concluded that the symptoms are mild — things like irritability, difficulty sleeping, anxiety and restlessness. Some people also experience depression, physical discomfort, sweating and headaches.

In terms of the scope, duration and significance of abuse, the FDA found that alcohol, heroin and cocaine have the highest adverse consequences, while marijuana ranks lower. Notably, it was in the lowest ranked group for serious medical outcomes such as death. “Although abuse of marijuana produces clear evidence of harmful consequences, including substance use disorder, they are relatively less common and less harmful than some other comparator drugs,” the review read.
 

Sativied

Well-Known Member
From Amsterdam's mayor, good piece on the war of drugs:


"In her article published on Friday, Halsema noted that the Netherlands is somewhat lenient on people caught with a small quantity of hard drugs. She also explained what happened when international pressure prompted the country to make MDMA illegal as a hard drug included on the Opium Act list, despite her opinion that the "relatively harmless" nature of the drug. "This shift inadvertently contributed to the profitability of illegal MDMA production and created a lucrative business model for criminal organisations, as evidenced by the estimated 18.9 billion euro street value of annual ecstasy production in the Netherlands."
 
Top