The myth of bottled nutes and TLO

hyroot

Well-Known Member
I can dig it man, this is my reasoning why liquid kelp works. Maybe not optimally, but certainly works.

Murphy's Law

Your providing composted organic matter that fungus prefer, and re inoculating it when you add your ewc and compost If it is hmri listed its most likely good to go.

Your inoculating, not building your web from scratch. You should be able to get all the benefits you need from either once everything is established. The CEC should be regulating itself in your media, this is just for beefing up microbes in teas.

cec is cation exchange capacity. how much water is absorbed and held by dry material. Peatmoos, coco, compost, etc... All have good cec.

btw omri is bullshit. Another label anyone can pay for. A good example is pure spray green . Supposedly organic and omri. Then it turned out they lied. And it was petroleum based. Then was banned from California and Oregon . Same thing with Humboldt county's own..
 

hydroMD

Well-Known Member
cec is cation exchange capacity. how much water is absorbed and held by dry material. Peatmoos, coco, compost, etc... All have good cec.

btw omri is bullshit. Another label anyone can pay for. A good example is pure spray green . Supposedly organic and omri. Then it turned out they lied. And it was petroleum based. Then was banned from California and Oregon . Same thing with Humboldt county's own..
cec is cation exchange capacity. how much water is absorbed and held by dry material. Peatmoos, coco, compost, etc... All have good cec.

btw omri is bullshit. Another label anyone can pay for. A good example is pure spray green . Supposedly organic and omri. Then it turned out they lied. And it was petroleum based. Then was banned from California and Oregon . Same thing with Humboldt county's own..
Yeah sorry, I was referring to the biomass not CEC.

And I agree with you that not all bottles are okay, absolutely. I just differ when I believe there are some that are.

I believe that the composted organic material from *some* bottles, once inoculated, will support sufficient amounts of microorganisms to successfully inoculate your TLO grow.


Its good to know just how weary to be of bottled nutes, which im learning why most just preach "NO"

Im not concrete in my opinions, but I do believe I understand enough to have and facilitate civilized conversations on the subject.
 

hyroot

Well-Known Member
Yeah sorry, I was referring to the biomass not CEC.

And I agree with you that not all bottles are okay, absolutely. I just differ when I believe there are some that are.

I believe that the composted organic material from *some* bottles, once inoculated, will support sufficient amounts of microorganisms to successfully inoculate your TLO grow.


Its good to know just how weary to be of bottled nutes, which im learning why most just preach "NO"

Im not concrete in my opinions, but I do believe I understand enough to have and facilitate civilized conversations on the subject.

a lot of bottles say "derived from " , not actually in there. Just derived from what ever and then processed with chemicals and / or synthetics.
 

hydroMD

Well-Known Member
a lot of bottles say "derived from " , not actually in there. Just derived from what ever and then processed with chemicals and / or synthetics.
So maybe we should say that some, not most, hmri products are safe.

Also be weary of derivatives that probably contain unwanted chelating agents

My thoughts on lean towards a safe bottle probably doesnt colonize as fast as the meal

Since he meal has composted undisturbed its breaking down faster than the bottled

The bottle doesnt contain microbes, but it will support them, thus allowing them to multiply when conditions permit.

A little slower going matter for some microbes to stick to. A little more organic matter to work in the rhyzosphere.

I will definately look into specific effects of various bottles ingredients on microbes.
 

209 Cali closet grower

Well-Known Member
Yes, it evaporates like chlorine.

Im not arguing that its best practice as ive said before in this post.

It is not a why you should debate,its simply going to show that you can still keep your soil food web booming even if you run through some bottles fo whatever reason.

I see a lot of people spouting on about any bottled nutes killing microbes when this isn't true.

Only point im making :)

Plenty of reasons to go all water but knowing that bottled nutes is an option without ruining your ecosystem is very pertinent for some scenerios.

Having a 6 month girl running in TLO can be hard to amend without hindsight. Being able to add a little organic matter that is a bit more soluble can pay serious dividends if its between defeciencies or suppliment

Continue debate below :)
synthetics nutes don't kill the soils web of life. Anything can be bad. Yes if u put to much nutes on anything u can kill it. Organics or synthesis. All I'm saying is. Synthesis won't kill off , the food of life in the soil. If done right.

Most farms in u.s.a us synthetic
I see a whole lot of people on here swearing that any bottled nutrients are terrible for microbial life

I was hoping to shed a little light on this.

Because a nutrient source comes in a bottle, it does not make it inherently bad practice to use. The hang up lies in the subtleties.

Any fertilizer that has been broken down with chelations (organic or synthetic acids used to break down non soluble organic matter into its soluble form)as well as anything with a high npk will hinder your microbial life just like adding synthetics.

Synthetics: Two main reasons to avoid any synthetic fert and the main reason bottled nutes get their bad name :).
1, it has been broken down into soluble form for the plant already. This means the plant has access to readily useable npk, and has no use to keep producing root exudates which is what attracts fungus and bacteria to your root system in the first place.Without a exudates (fungus' source of carbon) and some non soluble organics your micro life will starve.
2, synthetic fertilizers have high salt counts. The higher salt levels will create osmotic shock to bacteria as it leaches its moisture out of the cell walls into the higher concentrations of salts. This will kill the soil web real quick.

Bottled organics: This is where things turn a lil more grey. Bottled organic nutrients are NOT inherently bad, and if used correctly they can actually up your TLO game from water only in regards to final product. Again, anything that contains chelation, organic or not, is going to be bad. Essentially its the same effect as synthetic #1. Too much soluble food and the symbiosis of root/microbes is hindered.
However, there are liquid ferts out there that will enhance your biomass rather than deter it. Makes sure you use very low phospherous count. We want to feed the microbes, not hinder. High phospherous in soluble form is very bad for fungus and mycoryzhae. The key here is using your bottles in low doses for teas and allowing things to cook. The added npk in your teas are for the microbes, not your plant. I use a .2-.3-.7 liquid organic additive for my tea. Works wonders especially in longer flowering girls.

Conclusion: dont let those water only snobs form your opinion for you ;) When feeding your microbes, a little goes a long ways... plenty of fantastic additives in dry and liquid form out there, it may take some time and research to figure out what will compliment your mix.

ANYTHING HMRI listed is a good start. After that contacting companies to find out if any chelation (key-lay-shun) has been used. If so, this is not a great product for TLO organics and your soil food web.

Any input from reputable sources welcome :)
 

hydroMD

Well-Known Member
synthetics nutes don't kill the soils web of life. Anything can be bad. Yes if u put to much nutes on anything u can kill it. Organics or synthesis. All I'm saying is. Synthesis won't kill off , the food of life in the soil. If done right.

Most farms in u.s.a us synthetic
Trolling?

If your using little enough it may not completely kill all your microbes, but it will hinder colonization dramatically.

A) osmotic shock is real

B) chemicals kill microbes over time
 

greasemonkeymann

Well-Known Member
Yes, it evaporates like chlorine.

Im not arguing that its best practice as ive said before in this post.

It is not a why you should debate,its simply going to show that you can still keep your soil food web booming even if you run through some bottles fo whatever reason.

I see a lot of people spouting on about any bottled nutes killing microbes when this isn't true.

Only point im making :)

Plenty of reasons to go all water but knowing that bottled nutes is an option without ruining your ecosystem is very pertinent for some scenerios.

Having a 6 month girl running in TLO can be hard to amend without hindsight. Being able to add a little organic matter that is a bit more soluble can pay serious dividends if its between defeciencies or suppliment

Continue debate below :)
another good point. (not the salt statement, that one still doesn't jive)
But your point on keeping older plants alive without liquid nutrients or a soil that is more catered to a long life (meaning more slow-release nutrients) a properly assembled soil and a big enough container and you usually won't need to.
Are you saying a 6 month from seed or clone?
What works really well for me is comfrey. I swear that plant is a must have. It literally dissolves in soil. You can shred it up or cut strips or simply bury the whole damn leaf and it disappears in days.
Some of that mixed in with my compost and a speck of EWC, it's a good topdress. I kinda prefer to go light on the EWC for topdresses, it's a little thick, but comfrey works perfect for that.
 
Last edited:

greasemonkeymann

Well-Known Member
Liquid kelp and fish emulsion are not organic?

Please explain this to me. The microbes arent working in powdered kelp either... its a catalyst for the natural process of chelation in your teas.

You compost your kelp meal and then add ewc or compost to inoculate it.


How is this different than doing so with the liquid version?!?!
liquid kelp and fish emulsion may be organic, but the process they both go through defeats the purpose of using them to begin with.
From what I seen of your posts, you confuse me a little bit, one minute you seem fairly knowledgable and the next minute you argue/ask why a liquid processed kelp or powdered processed kelp is inferior to kelp meal... or fish emulsion?...
I wouldn't use either of those, a kelp meal and fish hydrolysate would be a much better way to go.
Your arguments are just confusing man...
Sure you can use a whole lot of inferior growing methods, but why would you do that?
Unless you grow in like new Zealand or somewhere where you can't get anything... but then you'd probably not have access to bottled stuff anyways.
 

hydroMD

Well-Known Member
liquid kelp and fish emulsion may be organic, but the process they both go through defeats the purpose of using them to begin with.
From what I seen of your posts, you confuse me a little bit, one minute you seem fairly knowledgable and the next minute you argue/ask why a liquid processed kelp or powdered processed kelp is inferior to kelp meal... or fish emulsion?...
I wouldn't use either of those, a kelp meal and fish hydrolysate would be a much better way to go.
Your arguments are just confusing man...
Sure you can use a whole lot of inferior growing methods, but why would you do that?
Unless you grow in like new Zealand or somewhere where you can't get anything... but then you'd probably not have access to bottled stuff anyways.
I dont argue that liquids are better. I am arguing the stance that they can support microbial life.

:)

And asking the difference is more for conversation sake than anything. Just referring back to the murphy's law bit.
 

greasemonkeymann

Well-Known Member
I dont argue that liquids are better. I am arguing the stance that they can support microbial life.

:)

And asking the difference is more for conversation sake than anything. Just referring back to the murphy's law bit.
ok, I gotcha...
But one could also argue that miracle grow potting mix could support microbial life too..
I see your point, but lke I said earlier, you can grow cannabis often times in SPITE of what we do to the poor plants...
I have seen nails in the stems (gasp!), defoliation, grows using incandescents (even halogens) etc, etc...
cannabis will grow.
Maybe I just don't see the point of this thread, why would you want to tell people how to grow inferiorly?
If someone asks me for advice I typically like to steer them towards the best advice possible, not ways they CAN do it.
Just me, but I come from an auto-repair industry... So I am legally obligated to do my job the correct way...
 

Moe Flo

Well-Known Member
Miracle Grow is the best of the worst. My first grow was all MG fert, every water. The plant looked good But when I fed the plant the spring tails would bounce like crazy. This has never happened again. I'm convinced I was murdering them with the MG. They where dancing like on hot coals.
 

Dr. Who

Well-Known Member
Microbes are only one reason why not to use bottled nutrients. Us 'Organic Snobs' also think about the environment. I know it's crazy talk, but I don't think it's sustainable, or good for our environment to ship a bunch of bottles across the world that are 98% water, and then take all the packaging and add it to our landfills. Not to mention the marketing bs, prices and quality of products in those bottles.


Would you care to describe what you would consider an additive? Because I can bubble a little kelp meal and alfalfa and get the job done better and cheaper than the crap on the hydrostore shelves.

I'm all ears,

P-
EXACTLY!
Environment! How about you google up how much available to be mined Phos is left ! I don't care how you break it down. Bottled nutrition is beginning to go down the road of unsustainability! Keep in mind that the bulk of mined P goes to weapons production by the worlds military powers that be! Think that will change???

Hmmm.....time for organics.
 

Dr. Who

Well-Known Member
I don't like animal based "organic" nutrition....

Fish emulsion = mercury (the Alaskan ones test very high)
Steamed bone meal = Mad cow possibility
Blood meal = antibiotics
feather meal = antibiotics
All of these examples have tested pos for what their listed for!

I would say that you have to be aware of what you use no matter what it is!

And someone mentioned the OMARI and in general the "organic" board that approves the use of the word "organic" on labels.

The whole board is a joke! The members include, Drug and chemical company executives, Politicians, Lawyers and a few folks that do know what they are talking about......You can read the minutes of meetings if you like. I like to hold my food down, so I quit reading them.......There is a drug company (They do have people ON this board) that starts every new years meeting with a vote to get their Bee killing neonictinoid poison rated organic! Thank your higher power that they get voted down every year!

Doc
 

greasemonkeymann

Well-Known Member
I don't like animal based "organic" nutrition....

Fish emulsion = mercury (the Alaskan ones test very high)
Steamed bone meal = Mad cow possibility
Blood meal = antibiotics
feather meal = antibiotics
All of these examples have tested pos for what their listed for!

I would say that you have to be aware of what you use no matter what it is!

And someone mentioned the OMARI and in general the "organic" board that approves the use of the word "organic" on labels.

The whole board is a joke! The members include, Drug and chemical company executives, Politicians, Lawyers and a few folks that do know what they are talking about......You can read the minutes of meetings if you like. I like to hold my food down, so I quit reading them.......There is a drug company (They do have people ON this board) that starts every new years meeting with a vote to get their Bee killing neonictinoid poison rated organic! Thank your higher power that they get voted down every year!

Doc
and I am pissed about the feather meal!
I liked my feather meal!
Damnit... mumble...grumble...
Now I am literally thinking about finding some hippy homesteaders to ask if I can have their natural chicken feathers, shit I like my slow release nitrogen amendments... I've pondered on saving my beard shavings too... if I recall, it's almost the same thing, like 12 percent super slow nitrogen release or so..
Yeah... i'm kinda weird... BUT it would be sorta cool to have a lil bit of myself in every container though.. Or am I a lil crazy?
 
Top