TWEED CANT GROW WELL SO THEY IRRADIATE(COLD PASTURIZATION)

Will you buy irradiated medicine?

  • Yes

    Votes: 17 13.5%

  • No

    Votes: 109 86.5%
  • Total voters
    126
gb123 said:
I don't have to..it's easily seen by most!

and I don't believe the forward bullshit looking statements.

as I've already said...INVEST away Rick More power to yas .(:
Click to expand...


You don't want to support your claims with facts?
Some of us have no problem doing so.
 
ok..you win Ricky...happy ?

Come back and Tell us the fortunes you make when you're rich ..(:

facts have nothing to do with socks :lol:
 
gb123 said:
ok..you win Ricky...happy ?

Come back and Tell us the fortunes you make when you're rich ..(:

facts have nothing to do with socks :lol:
Click to expand...


It was an honest question that was based on posting styles.
I meant no offence to you by asking, it was an honest question based upon similarities.

If I offended you by asking, I apologize.

For the record, I have no stake, share or desire to support or invest in tweed.
I like talking about stuff, I like factual conversation and debate. I've learnt a lot over the years by listening to people and have been wrong many times. I'm ok with that, I learn from mistakes.

I've been wrong here before and openly admitted to it without argument.

What I don't like, is being attacked for a difference of opinion. Especially when it's cowardly shots and running away from debate before supporting the attacks with facts.

I wouldn't say I like arguing, but I'm well equiped to support the arguments I make.

Again, if I offended you by asking about socks, I apologize.
 
ricky1lung said:
Did tweed post a profit or not?

That's what you guys asked and argue against. So, did they post a profit or not?
Click to expand...

Ok, I'll try this way...yes, they posted a net $1M profit for the quarter, but they also posted a $10M gross loss. Than means, really no profit when your still bleeding $9M a quarter in operating costs.

I know why the US investors are here, and why they also have to keep their money here....for now. If not for these long hold US investors tweedle never would've been able to get off the ground, and those same investors are the only thing sustaining their current business model until Rec gets here.
 
ricky1lung said:
It was an honest question that was based on posting styles.
I meant no offence to you by asking, it was an honest question based upon similarities.

If I offended you by asking, I apologize.

For the record, I have no stake, share or desire to support or invest in tweed.
I like talking about stuff, I like factual conversation and debate. I've learnt a lot over the years by listening to people and have been wrong many times. I'm ok with that, I learn from mistakes.

I've been wrong here before and openly admitted to it without argument.

What I don't like, is being attacked for a difference of opinion. Especially when it's cowardly shots and running away from debate before supporting the attacks with facts.

I wouldn't say I like arguing, but I'm well equiped to support the arguments I make.

Again, if I offended you by asking about socks, I apologize.
Click to expand...

' I like factual conversation and debate"

I'm afraid you have come to the wrong place, if your dealing with the 3 amigos all you will get is disinformation, fearmongering, and uneducated opinions. It's hard to have a battle of wits with unarmed opponents.

Itsme.
 
https://www.google.ca/finance?q=CVE:CGC&fstype=ii&ei=9FcNVpm2FdK8e6T0rPgK

Tweedle's financials...

Spending $5.5M and only taking in $2.47M (not sure from where??)...for an operating loss of -$3.03M/quarter. The companies trading @ a forward earnings of 78%…that's fucking insane for their current biz model (read: NOT in the black).

They also had $11M in "unusual income" last quarter, most likely the deals with DnA and Mr. Soul.

Bottom line, yes, with some fancy accounting, Tweedle did post a $1M net profit for the last quarter. But it's nowhere near a profitable company. It's US investors are the only thing currently keeping it afloat.
 
Last edited:
ricky1lung said:
It was an honest question that was based on posting styles.
I meant no offence to you by asking, it was an honest question based upon similarities.

If I offended you by asking, I apologize.

For the record, I have no stake, share or desire to support or invest in tweed.
I like talking about stuff, I like factual conversation and debate. I've learnt a lot over the years by listening to people and have been wrong many times. I'm ok with that, I learn from mistakes.

I've been wrong here before and openly admitted to it without argument.

What I don't like, is being attacked for a difference of opinion. Especially when it's cowardly shots and running away from debate before supporting the attacks with facts.

I wouldn't say I like arguing, but I'm well equiped to support the arguments I make.

Again, if I offended you by asking about socks, I apologize.
Click to expand...
It's a two way street ....
I treat others as such.
Ask Dex.

(:

cheers
 
TheRealDman said:
https://www.google.ca/finance?q=CVE:CGC&fstype=ii&ei=9FcNVpm2FdK8e6T0rPgK

Tweedle's financials...

Spending $5.5M and only taking in $2.47M (not sure from where??)...for an operating loss of -$3.03M/quarter. The companies trading @ a forward earnings of 78%…that's fucking insane for their current biz model (read: NOT in the black).

They also had $11M in "unusual income" last quarter, most likely the deals with DnA and Mr. Soul.

Bottom line, yes, with some fancy accounting, Tweedle did post a $1M net profit for the last quarter. But it's nowhere near a profitable company. It's US investors are the only thing currently keeping it afloat.
Click to expand...
oh fuck....dont let ricky know eh ;)

he can pull rabbits out his hat after all.
 
Its been like four god damn pages of this childish shit. Fuck sakes. Move on already and quit goading ppl into arguments, you're acting like a kid with aspergers
 
CalyxCrusher said:
Its been like four god damn pages of this childish shit. Fuck sakes. Move on already and quit goading ppl into arguments, you're acting like a kid with aspergers
Click to expand...


Look.
I was asked a question.

Provided an answer, and yes was forced to defend facts for four pages.
I'm not the type to roll over.

I asked a question that is relevant to the issue of debt and profit that was brought up by other posters.

My question was posed to prove the point that Tweed has been in operation for under two years. In that time, they have made heavy investments and have taken control of the market share. And did in fact post a quarterly profit.

I was asked, I answered.

I suppose there are others in this thread who could also use your advice.
No worries here Calyx.
 
TheRealDman said:
Yes net profit was just over $1M, but "gross" operation loss was like $10M. I'm no chartered accountant (but I am a wall st.investor), but if I was the bean counter for tweedle, Rec sales can't come soon enough.

Acquisitions of other LPs with tweedle's stock options, only works while the stock is worth something....which is currently just over $2/share.

Tweed is well positioned to become a Rec MJ leader for sure, but they have no hope of relying on MMJ from a biz standpoint operating at their current run-loss ratio. Rec is the only way Tweedle survives....and it's alway been their not so secret MO.
Click to expand...
See Rick anyone can "profit" 1m when they're loosing 10m in operational cost in the same period of time. Now it takes a special type of stupid to think spending 10 to make 1 is sustainable let alone profitable...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top