Two eyes for an eye

ChesusRice said:

for perpetuity

Click to expand...

Rob Roy said:

You do realize with the law you proposed, selective enforcement will result in more black men being incarcerated ?

Click to expand...

Rob Roy said:

Your false allegations and innuendo are mildly entertaining, but do nothing to refute your Prohibitionist law proposal.

You do realize with the law you proposed, selective enforcement will result in more black men being incarcerated ? Is that your goal?

Are you a racist prohibitionist that can't stop bringing up kiddie diddling or just an ordinary Prohibitionist ?

Click to expand...

ChesusRice said:

Blah blah blah.
still cannot come up with a quote of me advocating for people to go to prison for weed.
Yet I can post dozens from you advocating for pedophilia and racial discrimination

Click to expand...

UncleBuck said:

so your answer is to scrap chesus' common sense compromise of a law, rather than work on eradicating the racism in the system?

why does that not surprise me?

oh, it's because you're a racial segregationist.

Click to expand...

Rob Roy said:

Laws that purport to own peaceful people should be disobeyed. Why am I surprised you think compromising other peoples freedom is acceptable? Oh, it's because you suck the giant phallus of government like a two bit whore.

Click to expand...

Rob Roy said:

So, if you were 15 and your 15 year old boyfriend diddled your baby boner, you couldn't have possibly consented to that?

I was younger than that and a female older than me jumped my bones, I didn't object. Are you saying it was not consensual? I went back for more and somehow didn't feel abused.

Also, can children consent to anything or are they only unable to consent to heinous things? How does that work?

You seem like you want to change the line of conversation to an allegation that I approve of pedo acts. That's intellectually dishonest, except you might be granted an exception, because you have no intellect to speak of.

So, how does the nature of an act, even if it is heinous, determine whether or not it involved consent?

Click to expand...

Rob Roy said:

I see you what you did there Prohibitionist. Since you are such a genius answer the question posed.

Click to expand...

ChesusRice said:

I did. You don't like the answer.
Go build straw man Racist Pedo

Click to expand...

Rob Roy said:

Actually no sock puppet YOU didn't answer the question.


Are you saying that a person, say a 17 year old healthy male, (not one obsessed with shitting on floors) is incapable of consenting to banging a 21 year old woman?

Are you interested in buying some swamp land Prohibitionist?

Click to expand...

Rob Roy said:

Actually no sock puppet YOU didn't answer the question.


Are you saying that a person, say a 17 year old healthy male, (not one obsessed with shitting on floors) is incapable of consenting to banging a 21 year old woman?

Are you interested in buying some swamp land Prohibitionist?

Click to expand...

Rob Roy said:

You contradict yourself turkey sandwich boy. Children can consent to things you agreed to in an earlier post, you even pointed it out.



I said, how does the nature of an act, even if it is reprehensible change whether it was consented to or not?

You've avoided that question, like a Wendy's janitor avoids his scheduled shift after seeing your car leaving the parking lot.

Click to expand...

UncleBuck said:

you're talking about 13 year olds though.

apparently, you don't think having sex with a 13 year old is sexual molestation of a minor.

it is though.

Click to expand...

Rob Roy said:

You claimed a person (a minor) is incapable of consenting to sex.

Click to expand...

UncleBuck said:

are you claiming that 13 year old kids can consent to sex?

WOW

Click to expand...