Why is Trump so hellbent on killing as many women, children, terminal, and poor people as possible?

UncleBuck · May 24, 2017

tampee said:
I never visited why would I apologize?

you admitted repeatedly that you visited sites with child por, and you even defended it. why?

Olive Drab Green · May 24, 2017

twostrokenut said:
Get some!

Tax "the wealthy" at 100%, what number did you come up with?

The majority of the nation's wealth. Because the 1% own the majority of the nation's wealth, and that's obviously more than the lower 99%. That's easily enough to fix the budget. If you disagree, you're literally brain dead.

You and I should meet up. Loser dies.

twostrokenut · May 24, 2017

Fogdog said:
Taxes in other instances have proven effective at encouraging behavior in the right direction.

Who ever said carbon emissions taxes would eliminate carbon emissions? That's a straw man argument. Dude, you aren't talking to six year olds.

An argument against carbon taxes is they would create a revenue stream and conflict of interest in ending carbon emissions. Its a fake argument. But, if you had made that argument, at least you wouldn't sound foolish like you did in your post. Instead, you chose the foolish argument.

You can't even prove that carbon is a pollutant.

Olive Drab Green · May 24, 2017

twostrokenut said:
You can't even prove that carbon is a pollutant.

Actually, we have. It's a scientific fact it increases atmospheric temperatures in the same way adding salt to a pot of water lowers its boiling point.

UncleBuck · May 24, 2017

twostrokenut said:
I was talking to bunk, pointing out it was your source I quotes from. ok dude? Jeez.
Buck just said your source is a jew hating conspiracy site, and your still trying to beef it up with me. So precious.

i just assume whatever you post is from some propaganda mill or the other. i didn't even read it.

i've been enjoying watching you shill your very hardest for trump. you must be having bad luck with the penny sorting.

UncleBuck · May 24, 2017

twostrokenut said:
You can't even prove that carbon is a pollutant.

the only person who would argue for the shit you argue for would have to paid or incredibly stupid.

so which one are you?

tangerinegreen555 · May 24, 2017

twostrokenut said:
You can't even prove that carbon is a pollutant.

Put your mouth over a fucking exhaust pipe and inhale the fresh air.

Jesus fucking Christ already.

twostrokenut · May 24, 2017

Olive Drab Green said:
The majority of the nation's wealth. Because the 1% own the majority of the nation's wealth, and that's obviously more than the lower 99%. That's easily enough to fix the budget. If you disagree, you're literally brain dead.

You and I should meet up. Loser dies.

You literally said tax. Not confiscate private property. Do you not remember or did you just flip flop because the math won't work?

If you tax the wealthy, at 100% for fy 2017....what number do you get?

UncleBuck · May 24, 2017

twostrokenut said:
You literally said tax. Not confiscate private property. Do you not remember or did you just flip flop because the math won't work?

If you tax the wealthy, at 100% for fy 2017....what number do you get?

who said to tax the wealthy at 100%?

are you so pathetic that you need a strawman that badly?

sad.

twostrokenut · May 24, 2017

Olive Drab Green said:
Actually, we have. It's a scientific fact it increases atmospheric temperatures in the same way adding salt to a pot of water lowers its boiling point.

Nope. We have proven no positive feedbacks for carbon in the atmosphere, quite the opposite. Link me a climate thread and I will meet you over there dude.

Get better bait.

Olive Drab Green · May 24, 2017

twostrokenut said:
You literally said tax. Not confiscate private property. Do you not remember or did you just flip flop because the math won't work?

If you tax the wealthy, at 100% for fy 2017....what number do you get?

The 1% acquired the money they have through dubious and unsavory means, fucking the other 99%. That property isn't theirs. If people are dying due to their negligence and corporate theft, their life and property should be forfeit and the wealth redistributed.

Fogdog · May 24, 2017

twostrokenut said:
You can't prove to me that carbon is a pollutant.

FIFY

Olive Drab Green · May 24, 2017

twostrokenut said:
Nope. We have proven no positive feedbacks for carbon in the atmosphere, quite the opposite. Link me a climate thread and I will meet you over there dude.

Get better bait.

Yes, we have. You're deluded and uneducated.

What happens when there is too much CO2 and not enough oxygen in your blood stream? You flail like a fish and die.

twostrokenut · May 24, 2017

tangerinegreen555 said:
Put your mouth over a fucking exhaust pipe and inhale the fresh air.

Jesus fucking Christ already.

Your avatar is Ron Paul's sound money he goes on and on about. Lol

It's nice you show your support for that with every post.

UncleBuck · May 24, 2017

twostrokenut said:
Nope. We have proven no positive feedbacks for carbon in the atmosphere, quite the opposite.

again, only someone who is really fucking dumb (to the point of literal mental retardation) would say that. or you'd have to be paid so spew such obvious lies.

so which is it? are you dumb, or a paid liar?

UncleBuck · May 24, 2017

twostrokenut said:
Your avatar is Ron Paul's sound money he goes on and on about. Lol

It's nice you show your support for that with every post.

did you like rawn pawl because he, like you, felt that if you made him serve the "purples" you'd just hate 'em more now?

tampee · May 24, 2017

xmatox said:
I highly doubt that. I was in the shit, and wasn't paid anywhere near what the job was worth. How about let's stop paying contractors billions when our military is capable of 90% of the shit they do.

Well of course not a mercenary is paid way more than a pawn but they also don't have the entire force of the US military on their side. Not to mention most mercenaries are veterans of military so you can still get much better than hazard duty pay unless you lost a limb or something. I look at like the best opportunity for a pawn personally.

Only problem with the US military not paying contractors is the same as road crews, if they don't spend the entire budget they will get less money next year.

UncleBuck · May 24, 2017

tampee said:
Well of course not a mercenary is paid way more than a pawn but they also don't have the entire force of the US military on their side. Not to mention most mercenaries are veterans of military so you can still get much better than hazard duty pay unless you lost a limb or something. I look at like the best opportunity for a pawn personally.

Only problem with the US military not paying contractors is the same as road crews, if they don't spend the entire budget they will get less money next year.

you sound shit stupid in every single post you make.

tangerinegreen555 · May 24, 2017

twostrokenut said:
Your avatar is Ron Paul's sound money he goes on and on about. Lol

It's nice you show your support for that with every post.

Google the fucking image

twostrokenut · May 24, 2017

Olive Drab Green said:
The 1% acquired the money they have through dubious and unsavory means, fucking the other 99%. That property isn't theirs. If people are dying due to their negligence and corporate theft, their life and property should be forfeit and the wealth redistributed.

You want to confiscate Disney world to pay for social justice. Got it.

Why is Trump so hellbent on killing as many women, children, terminal, and poor people as possible?

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member