Will You Take The Vaccine?

Are you going to take the corona virus vaccine?

  • No.

  • Yes.

Results are only viewable after voting.
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Budley Doright

Budley Doright

Well-Known Member
PJ Diaz said:
aapsonline.org

Open Letter from Physicians to Universities: Allow Students Back Without COVID Vaccine Mandate - AAPS | Association of American Physicians and Surgeons

Dear Deans, Governing Boards and Trustees, On behalf of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, I am writing to ask you to reconsider your new policy mandating COVID-19 vaccination of students prior to returning […]
aapsonline.org aapsonline.org
Click to expand...
Hmmm, not a group that really seems concerned about the public but more about themselves.
www.theatlantic.com

The Opposite of Socialized Medicine

A small, litigious group has spent decades trying to stop the government from telling doctors what to do. What happens if it succeeds?
www.theatlantic.com www.theatlantic.com
 
hanimmal

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
DIY-HP-LED said:
Some people don't need Russian help to be traitors Hanimmal, in fact most American traitors don't need any Russian help with treason at all. The domestic disinformation helps, but only if they are predisposed and weak minded. Most of these morons get radicalized by their own bigotry, hate radio and foxnews, just the younger neonazi, civil warriors and white nationalist types are getting the bulk of their info online. Sure the Russians reflect a lot back and create some narratives and stage events, but it's a fart in the wind compared to the hate for profit and clicks bunch.
Click to expand...
It is a foreign military attacking all of our citizens all the time with pinpoint accuracy.

Sorry if I don't trust your placating of their warfare on our society.

Just looking at what has happened since 2014 shows that it has been extremely effective.
 
Last edited:
TacoMac

TacoMac

Well-Known Member
Billyjob007 said:
Here's one if you need more jest ask
money.cnn.com

Three journalists leaving CNN after retracted article

Three CNN journalists, including the executive editor in charge of a new investigative unit, have resigned after the publication of a Russia-related article that was retracted.
money.cnn.com
Click to expand...
You are a blithering idiot. First off you had to go all the way back to 2017 to find anything, which is stupid as you say they "always lie".

Another point, you really should learn to read your own sources before you post them. Nobody lied in that article, it was simply that proper procedures weren't followed. From your own link:

An internal investigation by CNN management found that some standard editorial processes were not followed when the article was published, people briefed on the results of the investigation said.​
​
The story, which reported that Congress was investigating a "Russian investment fund with ties to Trump officials," cited a single anonymous source.​
​
These types of stories are typically reviewed by several departments within CNN -- including fact-checkers, journalism standards experts and lawyers -- before publication.​

That is why they resigned. Oh, and then there's this:

In a staff meeting Monday afternoon, investigative unit members were told that the retraction did not mean the facts of the story were necessarily wrong. Rather, it meant that "the story wasn't solid enough to publish as-is," one of the people briefed on the investigation said.​
​
And as it turns out, they weren't wrong at all. Paul Manafort was later convicted of securing those funds attached to the Trump campaign.

Now how stupid do you feel?
 
Herb & Suds

Herb & Suds

Well-Known Member
TacoMac said:
You are a blithering idiot. You really should learn to read your own sources before you post them. Nobody lied in that article, it was simply that proper procedures weren't followed. From your own link:

An internal investigation by CNN management found that some standard editorial processes were not followed when the article was published, people briefed on the results of the investigation said.​
​
The story, which reported that Congress was investigating a "Russian investment fund with ties to Trump officials," cited a single anonymous source.​
​
These types of stories are typically reviewed by several departments within CNN -- including fact-checkers, journalism standards experts and lawyers -- before publication.​

That is why they resigned. Oh, and then there's this:

In a staff meeting Monday afternoon, investigative unit members were told that the retraction did not mean the facts of the story were necessarily wrong. Rather, it meant that "the story wasn't solid enough to publish as-is," one of the people briefed on the investigation said.​
​
And as it turns out, they weren't wrong at all. Paul Manafort was later convicted of securing those funds attached to the Trump campaign.

Now how stupid do you feel?
Click to expand...
I can only speak to how stupid he looks
 
captainmorgan

captainmorgan

Well-Known Member
Saw a interview with a major GOP talking head that did focus groups with anti-vaccers, I came away with the conclusion that they are just spoiled children. You know the children I'm talking about, the ones that dig their heels in more when you try to change their minds. If you say anything negative what so ever they basically put their fingers in their ears. He even said you can't say the word government in any way or they shut down. So instead of saying "Government Public Health Official" you have to just say "Public Health Official". The cult is so brainwashed that they are triggered by the word "Government". He basically said you have to placate to their every whim or they will hold their breath and stomp their feet, probably need to constantly tell them how special they are too, just like their orange god.
 
DIY-HP-LED

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Billyjob007 said:
Lol that's a bunch of tweets were evidence not tweets.
Click to expand...
He provides the evidence with his own words, they just report it and offer a character assessment. He's still repeating Trump's big lie and that makes him a liar and a scumbag, though it probably makes you a mere sucker and fool.
 
B

Billyjob007

Member
captainmorgan said:
Saw a interview with a major GOP talking head that did focus groups with anti-vaccers, I came away with the conclusion that they are just spoiled children. You know the children I'm talking about, the ones that dig their heels in more when you try to change their minds. If you say anything negative what so ever they basically put their fingers in their ears. He even said you can't say the word government in any way or they shut down. So instead of saying "Government Public Health Official" you have to just say "Public Health Official". The cult is so brainwashed that they are triggered by the word "Government". He basically said you have to placate to their every whim or they will hold their breath and stomp their feet, probably need to constantly tell them how special they are too, just like their orange god.
Click to expand...
DIY-HP-LED said:
He provides the evidence with his own words, they just report it and offer a character assessment. He's still repeating Trump's big lie and that makes him a liar and a scumbag, though it probably makes you a mere sucker and fool.
Click to expand...
You poor people u are fucked. I fill bad for your kids u voted there future away. ..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top