SirGreenThumb
Well-Known Member
I could see him rocking back and forth in a chair clapping uncontrollably laughing at himself...
You Also Can't Keep Your Doctor
- Thread starter Wavels
- Start date
echelon1k1
New Member
Stock boy is not a proper description of what you do, try "Home Maker"
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
echelon1k1
New Member
as opposed to the dank dank you dry next to cat shit?
you do know that particles of shit are surrounding your buds and do not enhance the flavour or aroma... Also congrats on 12 plants, 1200w and 1 pound...
you do know that particles of shit are surrounding your buds and do not enhance the flavour or aroma... Also congrats on 12 plants, 1200w and 1 pound...
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i'm past a pound already and still have 6 left to trim.
but good job on being exceptionally bitter, i would expect no less from sketchy etchy, the holocaust denier.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
thats a lot of disdain for an honest job there Buckaroo.
whats on your resume these days?
Internet Troll
Small Time Dope Pusher
Professional Layabout
Internet Attorney
Kept Boy
not too shabby.
work on those abs and you can get a gig as the cabana boy on a gay cruise.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
thats a lot of disdain for an honest job there Buckaroo.
whats on your resume these days?
Internet Troll
Small Time Dope Pusher
Professional Layabout
Internet Attorney
Kept Boy
not too shabby.
work on those abs and you can get a gig as the cabana boy on a gay cruise.
lol @ dope pusher.
as if i had to push it. it's out the door before i can barely snag some personal.
echelon1k1
New Member
You sell your weed wet do you moron?
ps. I can see why you attempt to dry your weed next to cat shit...
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
Damn, I think I'm the only straight edge stoner.
thats a lot of disdain for an honest job there Buckaroo.
whats on your resume these days?
Internet Troll
Small Time Dope Pusher
Professional Layabout
Internet Attorney
Kept Boy
not too shabby.
work on those abs and you can get a gig as the cabana boy on a gay cruise.
A Professional Layabout.
That is funny as all fuck.
see4
Well-Known Member
Wavels
Well-Known Member
Thanks for the advice.
When I log on to RIU, I usually inhale deeply, and repeatedly.
I do not need much help to become quite befuddled.
Wavels
Well-Known Member
I find it astonishing that some of the ACA defenders have desperately attempted misdirection and deception in order to hold the POTUS blameles.
Obama has no one to blame except himself.
The POTUS is not only mendacious, he is also becoming decidedly creepy as evidenced by his recent behavior, which is simply lying about lying.
What a class act.
[h=4]The Pinocchio Test[/h]Blaming the insurance companies can only go so far. First of all, the administration wrote the rules that set the conditions under which plans lose their grandfathered status. But more important, the law has an effective date so far in the past that it virtually guaranteed that the vast majority of people currently in the individual market would end up with a notice saying they needed to buy insurance on the Obamacare exchanges.
The administration’s effort to pin the blame on insurance companies is a classic case of misdirection. Between 75 and 95 percent of the problem stems from the effective date, but the White House chooses to keep the focus elsewhere.
[h=4]Three Pinocchios[/h]
(About our rating scale)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...f8335a3c-868c-11e2-9d71-f0feafdd1394&hpid=z11
Obama has no one to blame except himself.
The POTUS is not only mendacious, he is also becoming decidedly creepy as evidenced by his recent behavior, which is simply lying about lying.
What a class act.
[h=4]The Pinocchio Test[/h]Blaming the insurance companies can only go so far. First of all, the administration wrote the rules that set the conditions under which plans lose their grandfathered status. But more important, the law has an effective date so far in the past that it virtually guaranteed that the vast majority of people currently in the individual market would end up with a notice saying they needed to buy insurance on the Obamacare exchanges.
The administration’s effort to pin the blame on insurance companies is a classic case of misdirection. Between 75 and 95 percent of the problem stems from the effective date, but the White House chooses to keep the focus elsewhere.
[h=4]Three Pinocchios[/h]
(About our rating scale)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...f8335a3c-868c-11e2-9d71-f0feafdd1394&hpid=z11
SirGreenThumb
Well-Known Member
canndo
Well-Known Member
I find it astonishing that some of the ACA defenders have desperately attempted misdirection and deception in order to hold the POTUS blameles.
Obama has no one to blame except himself.
The POTUS is not only mendacious, he is also becoming decidedly creepy as evidenced by his recent behavior, which is simply lying about lying.
What a class act.
The Pinocchio Test
Blaming the insurance companies can only go so far. First of all, the administration wrote the rules that set the conditions under which plans lose their grandfathered status. But more important, the law has an effective date so far in the past that it virtually guaranteed that the vast majority of people currently in the individual market would end up with a notice saying they needed to buy insurance on the Obamacare exchanges.
The administration’s effort to pin the blame on insurance companies is a classic case of misdirection. Between 75 and 95 percent of the problem stems from the effective date, but the White House chooses to keep the focus elsewhere.
Three Pinocchios
(About our rating scale)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...f8335a3c-868c-11e2-9d71-f0feafdd1394&hpid=z11
Except one has to wonder. If all the folks who's plans are not grandfathered in because they were purchased after 2010 (i believe it is that year). LIKED their plan so much, why did they change it? At least once during that period?
canndo
Well-Known Member
This is a familiar tactic. Sprinkle some outright and proveable lies, add some projections with the assumption that those projections will go a certain way "Obamacare will not add a single dime....", put in a few purely subjective or unproveable statements (we only have 2 percent....), include at least one abmbiguous statment (the notion that the Whitehouse purposefully leak sensitive information is offensive ---- well, it is offensive now isn't it), and you get a misdirection that is calculated to be just that. Obama has made some glaring, obvious and immediatly proveable lying statements. If he is such a grand liar, then why present his lies with other statements that are conjecture at best?
SirGreenThumb
Well-Known Member
I posted the pic for the comedic value.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i posted some pics for comedic value as well. see post 83.
Similar threads
