How much or little do you think the US should intervene in foreign affairs?

You are an idiot. If there was such a thing it would happen. There are plenty of examples.

The congress is beholding to the voters. If we wanted to be sending in troops in mass to fight in NIgeria, for example we would. If we want us out of Nam. we get out.

If we want our childern to be dumb and dumber for what ever reason that is what we get. We allow what happens and we can stop any of it with blood in the streets. Things are just more calm now so you think it can't happen. I've seen it.

So the reason you seem un-informed about this, is:
1) you swerved the subject into a letter writing campaign some individual sponged up about taxes.
2) you assume that 20,000 letters day, not from an organized effort but from piss-offed Americans is nothing.
3) you think flooding congress with the un-organized, spotaneous WILL OF THE PEOPLE means nothing.

So confused you are. I'm a streetfighter. I'll go out again. Things are just more calm now.
You think Congress make choices for the benefit of the American people?

Lollerskates.
 
You think Congress make choices for the benefit of the American people?

Lollerskates.

No idiot too touchy feely.

It is not for benefit, it is to balance the WILL of the PEOPLE.

And if we were a little nothing like Ireland you would not know more about that you do, about he other counties that rank around you in not protecting yourselves but rely on others, like NATO.

If we were Moldova ranked like you, you know nothing. But, since we are the USA and WE the poeple run it, you can still sit back stupid like the rest of these do nothing countries in your rank. Jihad is spending and you are not. Lucky for you, we are.

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2034rank.html
Rank
country​
(% of GDP)​
Date of Information
1​
10.32​
2012​
2​
Oman
8.61​
2012​
3​
7.98​
2012​
4​
5.69​
2012​
5​
5.20​
2013​
6​
4.65​
2012​
7​
4.48​
2012​
8​
4.47​
2012​
9​
4.35​
2012​
10​
4.04​
2012​



125​
0.55​
2012​
126​
0.54​
2012​
127​
0.42​
2012​
128​
0.30​
2012​
 
No idiot too touchy feely.

It is not for benefit, it is to balance the WILL of the PEOPLE.

And if we were a little nothing like Ireland you would not know more about that you do, about he other counties that rank around you in not protecting yourselves but rely on others, like NATO.

If we were Moldova ranked like you, you know nothing. But, since we are the USA and WE the poeple run it, you can still sit back stupid like the rest of these do nothing countries in your rank. Jihad is spending and you are not. Lucky for you, we are.

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2034rank.html
Rank
country​
(% of GDP)​
Date of Information
1​
10.32​
2012​
2​
Oman
8.61​
2012​
3​
7.98​
2012​
4​
5.69​
2012​
5​
5.20​
2013​
6​
4.65​
2012​
7​
4.48​
2012​
8​
4.47​
2012​
9​
4.35​
2012​
10​
4.04​
2012​



125​
0.55​
2012​
126​
0.54​
2012​
127​
0.42​
2012​
128​
0.30​
2012​
Still trying to sling stones?

Self rule is a myth, David, but you could make it a reality if you took the money out of politics.
 
Still trying to sling stones?

Self rule is a myth, David, but you could make it a reality if you took the money out of politics.

Not just money, but parties.

I'd like to see our presidential election become more like american idol. We could start with 100 candidates, ask each a question and vote a few off every week. When we got down to the final two, we could pick 10 or so questions to ask each and then have our national vote. People would actually be voting on what these people claim to stand for instead of just the letter behind the name.
 
Not just money, but parties.

I'd like to see our presidential election become more like american idol. We could start with 100 candidates, ask each a question and vote a few off every week. When we got down to the final two, we could pick 10 or so questions to ask each and then have our national vote. People would actually be voting on what these people claim to stand for instead of just the letter behind the name.
Barry O claimed he'd close Guantanamo bay, cure AIDs, end the war of terror, etc

But then he was beholden to the Corporate donors who got him into office.

Take the money out of politics, and the parties will be based on political ideology rather than "the same old back-handers".
 
Barry O claimed he'd close Guantanamo bay, cure AIDs, end the war of terror, etc

But then he was beholden to the Corporate donors who got him into office.

Take the money out of politics, and the parties will be based on political ideology rather than "the same old back-handers".

I believe it would also take politics out of our unions and allow them to return to what they were intended for.

It wasn't just corporate donors he was beholden to. But yeah, your point rings true.
 
We got the Feds- when they aren't busy chewing away at our rights, they're hands down the nastiest gang of motherfuckers the world has ever seen. That is reason number one why we are still here- and while I'm a bleeding heart liberal for some causes, I'm all for making sure the nastiest bunch of motherfuckers the world has ever seen continues to work for US. By any means necessary, full stop.


Well it appears that you want the bully on your side. Why not disempower the bully by letting the air of his tires and refusing to enable him?

It seems like a bully can turn on his sycophants when he wants to... it's just a matter of time before that becomes obvious to even the most boot licking sheep.
 
You are an idiot. If there was such a thing it would happen. There are plenty of examples.

The congress is beholding to the voters. If we wanted to be sending in troops in mass to fight in NIgeria, for example we would. If we want us out of Nam. we get out.

If we want our childern to be dumb and dumber for what ever reason that is what we get. We allow what happens and we can stop any of it with blood in the streets. Things are just more calm now so you think it can't happen. I've seen it.

So the reason you seem un-informed about this, is:
1) you swerved the subject into a letter writing campaign some individual sponged up about taxes.
2) you assume that 20,000 letters day, not from an organized effort but from piss-offed Americans is nothing.
3) you think flooding congress with the un-organized, spotaneous WILL OF THE PEOPLE means nothing.

So confused you are. I'm a streetfighter. I'll go out again. Things are just more calm now.

So self rule means other people rule the self (an individual) ? You think the lowest level of self rule stops above the self at a group?

hmmm....idiot.....hmmmm.
 
Well it appears that you want the bully on your side. Why not disempower the bully by letting the air of his tires and refusing to enable him?

It seems like a bully can turn on his sycophants when he wants to... it's just a matter of time before that becomes obvious to even the most boot licking sheep.

Beat 'em or join 'em. How many of your family members do or have served in the Federal Government? 'THEY' are no more a single monolithic entity than We the People. And it turns out that We the People are the folks who make up the Federal Government.

We can all work to make it better for US, and the best way to do that is from within.

Because you aren't going to beat them. Them is us...
 
unions and jihad and mexicans and the war on poverty, oh my!

silly partisans will work their stupid talking points into anything.
 
I think maybe the raids upon the Barbary pirates may have been our only just foreign intervention.
that wasnt foreign intervention, that was a response to piracy, kidnapping and murder of americans at sea

the mexican american war was a response to attack on us citizens by a foreign power

the spanish american war was a response to brinksmanship and attack on us forces by a foreign power

ww1, ww2 and iraq1 & 2 were wars fought in defense of allies first and foremost.

afghanistan was a response to murder of americans by pirates (they just used planes instead of boats)

all those were well within the ideal of "the discourse of kings"

vietnam, korea, etc were all bullshit though
 
that wasnt foreign intervention, that was a response to piracy, kidnapping and murder of americans at sea
the mexican american war was a response to attack on us citizens by a foreign power
the spanish american war was a response to brinksmanship and attack on us forces by a foreign power
ww1, ww2 and iraq1 & 2 were wars fought in defense of allies first and foremost.
afghanistan was a response to murder of americans by pirates (they just used planes instead of boats)
all those were well within the ideal of "the discourse of kings"
vietnam, korea, etc were all bullshit though
It's pretty clear from this that you need professional help. This is by far the most delusion stuff I think I've seen you write to date. Where to start?
The most obvious would be: 'Iraq2' in defense of allies. Really. What ally was being defended? Korean war: 'bullshit'? The U.S. and NATO allies had just watched eastern europe consumed by the Soviet war machine and KGB. Now they were supposed to sit idly by whilst China did it in Asia? If you'd been the age you are now back then, I imagine you would have been screaming for blood.
Your revisionism is shameful.
 
It's pretty clear from this that you need professional help. This is by far the most delusion stuff I think I've seen you write to date. Where to start?
The most obvious would be: 'Iraq2' in defense of allies. Really. What ally was being defended? Korean war: 'bullshit'? The U.S. and NATO allies had just watched eastern europe consumed by the Soviet war machine and KGB. Now they were supposed to sit idly by whilst China did it in Asia? If you'd been the age you are now back then, I imagine you would have been screaming for blood.
Your revisionism is shameful.
oh you thick witted buffoon.

iraq 1 was a treaty defense of an ally (kuwait), and it ended in a Cease Fire, not a peace treaty.

the cease fire was contingent on numerous concessions from saddam and iraq, NONE of which were honored.

hostilities should have resumed immediately when the deal was broken, and in fact iraq never stopped firing at coalition aircraft in the agreed upon patrol zones.

Boo0o00o0oo0sh 1 and clinton, being pussies, let it slide for 10 long years at tremendous expense, allowing saddam to re-arm.

when Boooo000oo0oo00sh took office saddam decided to test him, and act a fool and got away with it too, until 9/11 when a huge amount of Fuck It was released into the american bloodstream, and saddam's antics were no longer tolerated.

and yes, korea was BULLSHIT

UN sponsored police action with no exit strategy, and a redline limiting all warmaking to OUR guy's territory? yeah, thats basic class A bullshit.

the UN cant even take a dump without splattering shit all over the floor
 
when Boooo000oo0oo00sh took office saddam decided to test him, and act a fool and got away with it too, until 9/11 when a huge amount of Fuck It was released into the american bloodstream, and saddam's antics were no longer tolerated.

that's demonstrably untrue.

even after 9/11, american sentiment towards an iraq invasion was baseline as compared to pre-9/11. the only time support for the iraq invasion was popular was after colin powell's infamous speech to the UN and the trumped up case for war immediately preceding the invasion.

support for that retarded and unnecessary war started dropping right after the invasion, too.

trying to explain the history with "Fuck it was released into the american bloodstream" is completely and utterly inaccurate, and demonstrably untrue as all facts will demonstrate.

it is beyond historical revisionism, it is white power historical reconstructionism.
 
Back
Top