UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
oh, that old tired line of bullshit.
"we don't see people in groups, so we CAN't be racist!"
and then you guys try to pen legislation that chops people up into groups to be discriminated against.
save your breath.
And the South shall rise again
- Thread starter ChesusRice
- Start date
oh, that old tired line of bullshit.
"we don't see people in groups, so we CAN't be racist!"
and then you guys try to pen legislation that chops people up into groups to be discriminated against.
save your breath.
echelon1k1
New Member
Buck do you suffer from Michael Jackson syndrome?
For a little white jew you're sure are obsessed with Black cock...
For a little white jew you're sure are obsessed with Black cock...
PeyoteReligion
Well-Known Member
First of all, you can't abort a baby. You abort an embryo. Big difference.
Are you suggesting that we only have sex in order to create a baby? Thats so rediculous its not even funny. Its just absurd. Everytime you had sex, you were procreating? How many fucking kids do you have? Do you think birth control is wrong because youre supposed to have a baby every time you have sex? Let's be real.
Flaming Pie
Well-Known Member
I don't find this to be "anti-woman" at all. 3 months is plenty of time to find out you are preg and take care of the "problem tissue" as they call it.
Some things I find weird:
The fetus grows in the womans body and is embedded in her uterus. To get rid of a 3month and up fetus risks damaging the womans uterus. So its not just getting rid of a "growth", it is also a procedure that affects the fertility of the woman.
The fetus only HALF belongs to the woman. There was a man involved remember? If the fetus resulted from consensual sex, shouldn't the man have a right in saying what happens to HIS half?
Some things I find weird:
The fetus grows in the womans body and is embedded in her uterus. To get rid of a 3month and up fetus risks damaging the womans uterus. So its not just getting rid of a "growth", it is also a procedure that affects the fertility of the woman.
The fetus only HALF belongs to the woman. There was a man involved remember? If the fetus resulted from consensual sex, shouldn't the man have a right in saying what happens to HIS half?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
ya ever catch the show "i didn't know i was pregnant"?
and how do you suggest the government go about monitoring every pregnancy in the united states?
lifegoesonbrah
Well-Known Member
oh, that old tired line of bullshit.
"we don't see people in groups, so we CAN't be racist!"
and then you guys try to pen legislation that chops people up into groups to be discriminated against.
save your breath.
Like what?
echelon1k1
New Member
I'm sure you've got some great ideas on how governments can get inside a womans vagina to provide the necessary oversight...
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
hr 7955, aka the "do not even suggest that homosexuality can be an acceptable lifestyle" bill.
penned by no other than rawn pawl, the racist bigoted douchebag.
woops, i meant "libertarian".
lifegoesonbrah
Well-Known Member
Lol you have that bill that never passed from 20 years ago memorized? You are desperate. It said they shouldn't appropriate funds for that. Do you think our government should waste money in supporting literature of different lifestyles? I don't, it sounds retarded. It is not the job of the government to enforce tolerance, it is common sense to be tolerant of one another.
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
I don't care if you fantasize about my wife, boy. Cause that's all you'll ever get.
Flaming Pie
Well-Known Member
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
If Obama had his way, the woman could abort her child up to 225 months after the baby daddy fucked and knocked her up.
Doer
Well-Known Member
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you fucking idiot.
the bill is not as you describe. it does not "appropriate funds for that". it keeps funds from being appropriated to ANY institution whatsoever that might even suggest that homosexuality can be an acceptable lifestyle.
so a school that takes any other stance other than "homosexuality can not even be suggested to be an acceptable lifestyle" would have funding pulled.
any hospital that takes a stance other than "do not even suggest that homosexuality can be an acceptable lifestyle!!!" would have its funding pulled.
and you defend that by trying to play dumb as to what the purpose of the bill actually is. nice.
but i guess when you play dumb like that, it takes away from the real point: that rawn pawl, supposed "libertarian" clearly sees people in groups and discriminates against some groups over others, in violation of the 14th amendment.
simply retarded. both of you.
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
Damn right, bruhtha. I consider liberals parasites, so why can't I abort them?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
boy?
no racial overtones there!
do you cry when she makes you watch them? or do you jerk off and fantasize?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you just admitted that you don't understand the consequences of your own position.
Flaming Pie
Well-Known Member
I understand if abortions after 3 months were illegal, the only way to get them would be illegally.
Wouldn't need to monitor any pregnancies.
Doer
Well-Known Member
Hmmm....sort of a post-birth abortion scheme. I see. Yes, yes, that could work, alright.
Similar threads
