BROBIE
Well-Known Member
So what you're saying is NPK + Micro's essentially, how do you know what you're measuring? Well you don't, on either side of the argument it's about what grows better crops.
So you're saying that either AN or Dyna's measurements might be off due to the concentrations of each element of the nutrient, and that because the NPK + Micro's aren't exactly the same then the test is invalid? That's why you run the test... to find out which is more "complete" if he's only using the base and not using additives with one not the other then the test is fine.
It's about testing the companies recipe against another companies recipe. If 2.0 EC grows better crops with one brand then the other then the brand that won has a more complete nutrient solution. What's hard to grasp, we're not understanding because your point is ridiculous.
You are the one with the stupid ppm post. If Homebrewer based his experiment on EC values (which he did) my point is he took it upon himself to alter the feeding based on his MISCONSTRUED UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT EC ACTUALLY MEASURES. equal ec values is not the variable in testing between 2 nutrients, one should read the directions