Arctic Breaks Ice Ceiling
- Thread starter squarepush3r
- Start date
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
Neo nazi covers the former, you are a pedophile, thanks for reminding us
Why do you praise rawn pawl after he blamed the 1993 wtc bombing on Jews?
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
I don't know who bombed the wtc in 1993. I've praised Ron Paul in a comparative sense. I don't need or want him to be "my leader", but I do think he would have been "the least douchy" when compared to his rivals when he ran for President.
You are a Poopy Pants. That's indisputable.
Still winning.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
So blaming the Jews for a terrorist event they didn’t do makes rawn pawl comparatively better than others in your view
You’re telling us anti Semitic conspiracy theories that lead to things like the holocaust are a positive thing for you
londonfog
Well-Known Member
of course you like Ron Paul, both of you are against The Civil Rights of 64.
Both love the days when blacks/brown where not allowed to enter certain establishments or had to go the back of the bus. I bet you hate drinking out of water fountains that ALL can drink out of.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
No.
What would have made Ron Paul less douchy, was the idea he would have ended the war on drugs, foreign empire and exposing the federal reserve scam etc.
You've somehow linked the federal reserve scam to being wrong, because the owners of the Fed might be Jews. That has nothing to do with it, (I don't know if they are Jews) . The reason it's wrong is the fraud involved, it would be wrong if a pack of Yeti was behind it.
Still winning.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Poor arguments are often based in error, yours is no different.
Water fountains that are owned by somebody, are up to that person to decide what to do with them, just like your laundromat is up to you to decide how to use it.
If I knew you discriminated against people, how does that change the property right you have in YOUR property? It doesn't.
I might not like your reasons for why you discriminate, but that doesn't change that you own something does it ?
If I demand that you use your property and your body to serve me against your will, what has occurred ?
Am I allowed to go into your house and piss in your water? Why not? Because it is your property.
londonfog
Well-Known Member
If I wanted to discriminate I could make my cleaners and laundromat a private club and charge a small membership for its use, but because I'm not a racial POS, I have my businesses OPEN TO THE PUBLIC so all can be clean.
The Civil Rights Act did nothing to stop you from being a racist POS. You still can, but if you have a business OPEN TO THE PUBLIC...it will be just that.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
So you're saying that following laws which force some people to use their body and/or property against their will to serve OTHER people is a good thing?
You may have just endorsed slavery.
Can you delegate a right you do not possess? (this is the question you, nor any of the hyenas can answer)
londonfog
Well-Known Member
I will answer both with one question.
Why would you stop me and others from dumping trash in front of your house but not on your property.
Can you delegate a right you do not possess and are you forcing us not to do something against our will ?
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
I will answer both with one question.
Why would you stop me and others from dumping trash in front of your house but not on your property.
Can you delegate a right you do not possess and are you forcing us not to do something against our will ?
How do theses questions refute my assertion that using offensive force to make people serve another person against their will is not protecting "equal rights". It's abusing them.
I cannot delegate a right I do not possess, which is why I wouldn't force you to serve me against your will.
TacoMac
Well-Known Member
Or, maybe I'd just like to get the facts right, unlike people like you who argue that bickering with an idiot that doesn't know the facts by using things that aren't the facts somehow has merit.
londonfog
Well-Known Member
would you stop me from dumping trash in front of your yard but not on your property ?
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
I would just like to point out that, depending on the nature of the trash, it might attract underage children.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
That all depends. You see, in order to get to my "yard" you'd have to come down a long private road that often requires 4 wheel drive. Good chance you'd never make it in.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
That was pretty good, low, but still pretty good.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
The only thing that’s low are your constant protestations that 10 year olds can consent you fucking pedophile
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
So you came to this thread to single me out for saying that water freezes at 32 degrees, now calling me an idiot, but gave OP a pass and offered no rebuttal in his therad. Yet, I'm to believe it's because you're obsessed with facts. You still have failed utterly to even indicate that you understood the conclusion of the argument, which withstands your correction regarding freezing temps and is still valid. Sorry that I didn't make it an academic study just to please a shiftless Bernout on a fucking weed site. Get a job, Bernie will never be president.
Notice how I don't have to assign a derogatory name to you to express my disdain.
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
In this case, you aren't right. Not that you are always wrong but there have been other instances where you bloviate on about something that is not true. (re: Tesla, "fuck trump" bumper sticker)
In this case, due to rapid glacier and sea ice melting during the summer a layer of fresh water or better put less salty water collects at the surface and it freezes at a higher temperature than fully loaded sea water. When this happens, simpletons like the fool that posted the OP, see sea ice layer larger than earlier years and the simpletons jump to a false conclusion. We've seen the same phenomenon before at the south pole. This is all to say that the effects of global warming are complex, which is why we hire people with many years of education and professional expertise to track and study it.
I'm not claiming this is germane to what AC said. His point is valid regardless and you picked out an unimportant detail to go on and be wrong about. Why you spend so much time on an unimportant point yet let the ragingly fake article found on the OP alone is a bit irritating. Why don't you point out something in that post for us all to laugh at and give us the chance to click on the like button?
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Presented with as little irony as possible.
There are gains every winter, almost without exception, for hundreds of millions of years.
