ginwilly
Well-Known Member
lol, now you are editing my posts without saying so and calling me racist.i know you can't, because you lied about what holder said.
why would you do that? is it because you are totally not racist?
lol, now you are editing my posts without saying so and calling me racist.i know you can't, because you lied about what holder said.
why would you do that? is it because you are totally not racist?
i will continue to call out racism when i see it. some people will continue to deny it, even though it is clear. take kynes for example. he cites rushton, has weird theories about multiculturalism, argues for "european cultural superiority" and so on and so forth.Buck, I'm going to leave you with it. You and I are bringing down the value of the neighborhood with this nonsense.
I'll make yet another plea to your decency. Stop with your retarded THAT"S RACIST shit and ad hom attacks and I'll treat you with civility and respect. I would much rather we all got along and rolling in the mud with you accomplishes little more than getting muddy.
i also edited my own post, distilling it to its most relevant and succinct form.lol, now you are editing my posts without saying so and calling me racist.
Alright, just so you can't say I was avoiding giving you a time stamp and think you actually proved something.i also edited my own post, distilling it to its most relevant and succinct form.
would you prefer that i lengthened your quote to "i can't help you anymore" in response to my request for a time stamp?
that's not how time stamps work.start at 0:00 ... between there and 7:something.
doesn't thomas sowell liken black culture to redneck, white trash culture without specifically defining what he means by each and despite some of the historical/geographical problems with his theory?Seems appropriate.....another fail culture.
[youtube]IerahEMmYZk[/youtube]
You really didn't have to go to all the trouble. Im half troll.i notice that your race focused comments are usually pretty ignorant, and this time you have outdone yourself.
california has a shitty graduation rate too, and yet our black population is HALF the national average (with nearly 5x the average population of asians and 8X the average population of chicanos) same goes for texas (less asians, more chicanos) and new mexico (way more chicanos)
are you arguing that chicanos and asians are also intellectually inferior?
southern states have shitty graduation rates because they have a huge number of Po Folks, and Po FFolks often have to get jobs instead of graduating, even if they are white.
southern states also have large numbers of ignorant backwards ass racists too, and those cats are often too dumb to graduate, despite their whiteness (and presumed intellectual superiroity)
maybe you should try and examine graduation rates in various ethnic communities, and see whats up.
for Po Folks, chicano and black high school dropout rates have been improving while poor white dropout rates are beginning to increase.
Yup, so what? That has nothing to do with the statements flamingpie said I made. I did not go on to say they were incapable of anything. Infect, I have often followed my racist statements by saying that the difference is so small that it cannot be attributed to an individual. In other words, I have said that any given black dude can be just as smart as the next guy.you said, and i quote, that blacks were from "an inferior lot".
Can you show me anything from sub-Saharan Africa that is comparable to the pyramids built by the Maya? Or architecture on par with anything the Inca did?black africa DID have costal fishing vessels, canoes, and other watercraft long before the arrival of the colonial powers. they crossed the sea to madagascar (ZOMG!!!) but since that's the only land mass that can be reached without sails and long distance navigation from sub saharan africa, thats hardly an indictment.
black africa developed iron working independently, and only about 500 years after india (current winners for first known iron working), yet still a couple hundred years ahead of europe and asia minor.
what they didnt develop was advanced philosophies, complex social structures, writing, large scale agriculture, large scale animal husbandry, or extensive trade networks, but that too is not a trait exclusive to africa.
the new world didnt have iron working, domesticated animals (except the llama and some dogs) the wheel, the road, or in fact much of anything in the way of technology all the way into the 1500's does this imply that native americans are intellectually inferior, or is it simply that they DID NOT NEED ANY OF THAT SHIT?
the road is a product of The Wheel. if you have no wheels, you need no roads. you only need wheels if you are taking lots of something to someplace else, like say... a granary. if you do not need a granary, because you dont grow grain, you will never need a wheel.
you only grow grain if you will starve when the snows come because theres too many people to live off the land. if your population is small enough and mobile enough, you can just follow the herds of bison, and do quite well, or eat fish, or eat seal blubber, or, as in central and south america, you live in the tropics and all year is the growing season.
sub saharan africa is much like south america, a tropical land where you can grow whatever you want in a small patch any time of year or hunt at your leisure, thus you need no long term food storage solutions, thus no wheels, and thus, no roads, and thus no complex trade routes, and thus not complex societies, and thus no need for writing to keep track of shit, and thus no literature, etc etc etc etc.
unlike south america, africa is in close proximity to peoples who DO need long term food storage, thus did need wheels, bult roads, formed complex societies, assembled armies, and set out to conquer other people's shit.
this puts preassur on other nearby societies to compete, and the huge desert of the sahara (which was not there when the humans who became asians europeans and native americans left africa...) formed a natural barrier keeping the african populace blissfully unaware of their danger until it was too late.
likewise the native americans didnt see europeans coming, and by the time they figured out what was up, it was already too late for most of them.
TLDR Version: africa didnt develop technologies because they didnt need them, just like the aboriginal population in the americas. if negroes are naturally stupider that whitey, then native americans must also be stupider, but being even farther behind, they must be even DUMBER.
contrast with:any given black dude can be just as smart as the next guy.
You make most black people I know appear smart.
Where is your tolerance bucky??contrast with:
[/FONT]
wash down with hefty amount of admiration for dr. kynes.
puke thoroughly.
enjoy!
You are asking UB where his tolerance is, but completely ignore that FinNBushy is totally racist?Where is your tolerance bucky??
Trick question, you never had any...
It is funny the difference between what you wish to appear as and what you really are. It is obvious that even you dont like yourself. LOL!!
I'm not totally racist. I think in general that there is only one inferior race, the others are about equal. A racist thinks his race is superior to ALL others. I don't.You are asking UB where his tolerance is, but completely ignore that FinNBushy is totally racist?
You are totally racist. TOTALLY. By ALL definitions. You can't slide out that easy. That is how you slip right into the racist hole.I'm not totally racist. I think in general that there is only one inferior race, the others are about equal. A racist thinks his race is superior to ALL others. I don't.