OddBall1st
Well-Known Member
Not only that but what are we gonna do about the water vaporless wind that blows all the water vapors away without replacing it ?
Satellite data proves Earth has not been warming the past 18 years - it's stable
- Thread starter sheskunk
- Start date
Not only that but what are we gonna do about the water vaporless wind that blows all the water vapors away without replacing it ?
OddBall1st
Well-Known Member
Maybe someone can explain how wind blows only the relative humidity away without also moving the CO2 in that same air mass ?? Anyone ?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
probably has something to do with the difference between CO2 and H20.
maybe bring upi your earth-shattering thoughts to the 34 national academies of science who have apparently neglected to go through the rigorous thought processes that you clearly have.
AlecTheGardener
Well-Known Member
Densities.
sheskunk
Well-Known Member
Maybe you should just blow those 34 national academies of science. Since you seem to love them so much. Then when you are done with that you can go blow those who made it illegal to deny blacks services.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
maybe i will.
Do you wonder if buck thinks CO2 is more or less dense than air?
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
Butthurt because the science is settled in ACC's favor
sheskunk
Well-Known Member
Actually, I agree that the Earths climate is changing. And I fully agree that man is part of the reason.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
"5th grade math" that you ddint find the flaw in for like 300 motherfucking posts.
you tried to say the study didnt exist, then that you cant see it (subtle distinction of course...) and then that it didnt exist again, despite linking to it several times, then you claimed it was a "right wing think tank" then that it doesnt exist (again...) then you spent like 30 posts calling names, then after i posted my math operations you STILL sad "what citation?"
then i said, i COULD be wrong, but this study over here says its even more!
<rinse and repeat previous attempts to dismiss an argument>
finally when all that failed, you got your wife to do the math for you.
1 math error vs 300 posts of name calling, denying the study exists, pretending you cant see the study, denying it exists again, claiming it came from a "right wing think tank" more name calling, and finally, denying it exists again, AFTER posting a screenshot from the very report you are claiming doesnt exist! then you said The Journal of Geophysics, Atmospheres and Science Magazine were "right wing think tanks" again.... finally after all that you declared my math was wrong (and sweet mother of god, you were right! the seventh seal has been broken, and the dead walk the earth cuz hell is full!)
all that BULLSHIT, using every fallacy known to man, and doing everything except making a substantive assertion or citing how i was wrong for ~300 posts, before you finally say my math is wrong, and you wonder why NOBODY believed you?
your credibility is nonexistent, and even pada said you were wrong, but that means pada thinks im right, so i must be wrong....
but pada agrees with you on almost everything...
and he insists termites produce ZERO co2, that they exhale methane instead.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
where did you get these assertions from?
not this thread.
wtf are you on about?
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
yes, the science is as settled as the "fact" that termites dont make co2, they only make methane.
the ONLY place i can find that crazy ass, wrongheaded, impossibly retarded, assertion it on "wikihhow"
and what have i told you about "wikiwisdom" so many times?
ITS BULLSHIT!
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
The Indian's and the Chineese are putting out multiple times more than we are and it is growing at an incredible rate.
Will the global warming just keep to their side of the globe?? Will Europe be able to pay enough to prevent global warming over that region??
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
The butthurt is palpable
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
the guy doesn't even know how to do exponents.
sheskunk
Well-Known Member
Hahahaha, "butthurt". That's a good one. Did you just come up with that on your own?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i said you never cited anything that showed that termites produce more than 30 billion tonnes of CO2.
and whadya know? you never did.
ditto your "hundredfold" claim that you took from red1966 (lol, dumbass).
ditto your "forest fires cause global cooling" claim you took from NLXSK (lol, dumbass).
like usual, you just lie and deceive.
no, your citing of the sydney institute, a right wing political front group that takes money from shell, had nothing to do with your continued lies about termites.
i just felt like pointing out how you were politicizing the issue with political groups that are funded by shell oil.
you are a dumbass and a joke.
protip: if i ask you to defend something from NLXSK or red, and you do, you are losing.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
that's not true, you just told another demonstrable lie.
still waiting on citation for your claim that "forest fires create global cooling".
or you can just keep lying and running away when you get caught lying.