Schuylaar's Sesh - SCOTUS Upholds Public Prayer..
- Thread starter schuylaar
- Start date
killemsoftly
Well-Known Member
Yeah, but do you do kids parties?Gerbils get a free pass. As long as they ride in the trunk.
sheskunk
Well-Known Member
Only if I can wear the clown suit.
killemsoftly
Well-Known Member
Girl, you are the clown suit.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
yep.
if there was a single historian who shared your pathetic and laughable view that the denial of service to blacks that you so lovingly support caused no harm, you would have cited them by now.
but every single historian ever agrees that the denial of service to blacks caused them much harm.
no one has a right to cause harm, but you believe they do as long as it is in the name of racism.
loser.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
[QUOTE="Rob Roy, post: 10496664, member: 10179You would go so far as to approve of harming an indifferent person. [/QUOTE]
you're the one in favor of harming people.
you defend the practice of denial of service to blacks who merely wanted to give business owners their money in exchange for goods and services.
every single historian everywhere agrees that caused harm, and you defend that causing of harm.
you're the one in favor of harming people.
you defend the practice of denial of service to blacks who merely wanted to give business owners their money in exchange for goods and services.
every single historian everywhere agrees that caused harm, and you defend that causing of harm.
Correct, now how many historians will note that you lost this debate 150 years from now? Not a single one, but that doesn't mean you didn't lose.
Unclefucktard said the following;
you're the one in favor of harming people.
you defend the practice of denial of service to blacks who merely wanted to give business owners their money in exchange for goods and services.
every single historian everywhere agrees that caused harm, and you defend that causing of harm. Here is where unclefucktard stopped talking [/QUOTE]
Isn't it ok to allow business owners to harm themselves by not taking the money of blacks in exchange for their goods or services?
Seems like not allowing blacks into your business is a good form of loss prevention. Much harder to screen out dope sick junkies.
killemsoftly
Well-Known Member
[/QUOTE]
Isn't it ok to allow business owners to harm themselves by not taking the money of blacks in exchange for their goods or services?
Seems like not allowing blacks into your business is a good form of loss prevention. Much harder to screen out dope sick junkies.[/QUOTE]
?????????????
WTF?
Isn't it ok to allow business owners to harm themselves by not taking the money of blacks in exchange for their goods or services?
Seems like not allowing blacks into your business is a good form of loss prevention. Much harder to screen out dope sick junkies.[/QUOTE]
?????????????
WTF?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
no, we instituted civil rights laws because of the harm that caused.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
so you have some historians who will say that denial of service to blacks did not cause any harm?
Your law has forced many blacks to eat spit sandwiches and piss soups over the years.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
lol, thanks for basically parroting ginwilly verbatim in this debate. doesn't boast well for ginwilly.
So you lost the debate and want to continue to show everyone what a loser you continue to be? Sure, lets do it.
So, besides your projecting your racist behavior and involving yourself in the family life of people who subjugate blacks and force them to work on the "plantation", what other skeletons you got in your closet?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
my wife's family came over from europe to escape the holocaust, nice try though.
come up with any historians who agree with the "no harm caused" line of historical denialism yet?
I know for a fact that a particular restaurant owner sets butter back each day that has his semen in it. He only gives it to black customers. He would have a whites only sign if permitted by law, and he would be out of business.
Instead he feeds his semen to black kids and their parents.
killemsoftly
Well-Known Member
Your dad is a very sick man bnb.
travisw
Well-Known Member
Assuming for a second that this isn't the very behavior that got you fired from Subway, how does a discussion like that start?
No fellow white person, don't eat the semen butter. Guess what I started doing to the butter today?
Do you still eat there? How do you know your friends quirks don't extend to other areas of the menu?
Which butter do you prefer?
Red1966
Well-Known Member
But not the option to not participate. Options? What kind of idiot response is that?