tiger loose in the zoo, eating people

Reprogammed

Well-Known Member
Nah, I don't think that'd be very badass at all.

Now if you were armed with nail clippers?
Well then shit, I think you just earned your eye patch.
 

rev3la7ion

Well-Known Member
But think about it, you could pry the nail clippers apart and use them as crude knives. Whereas the belt is just a fucking belt. Going up against a tiger that could slice it in half or bite it in half and still managing to strangle it to death beyond all odds and living to tell the tale seems like the most badass thing ever.
 

Reprogammed

Well-Known Member
What about the unfair advantage of a belt buckle and that small metal rod you put in the holes?

If you can pry apart nail clippers in time to react to a tiger attack, I will personally call you Hoss Delgado McSnakePlissken for the remainder of my life.
 

NO GROW

Well-Known Member
But think about it, you could pry the nail clippers apart and use them as crude knives. Whereas the belt is just a fucking belt. Going up against a tiger that could slice it in half or bite it in half and still managing to strangle it to death beyond all odds and living to tell the tale seems like the most badass thing ever.
It's time for your ridalin(spelling). We get it already, you want to choke a tiger with a belt.:confused:
 

Reprogammed

Well-Known Member
Thanks NO GROW.

No offense, but it is WELL established that you want to choke a tiger with a belt.
Meds time!
 

rev3la7ion

Well-Known Member
I don't want to but I think it'd be badass if someone did. Assume the metal rod is not used, hence the "choking the tiger to death with a belt". Still badass.
 

Reprogammed

Well-Known Member
Strong leather belt, cheap metal accessory, both are equal, I suppose, in their badassery.

(Didn't mean to sound like an ass, I typed it all with a grin)
 

iblazethatkush

Well-Known Member
Uh no offense but, you guys are nerds...Did you seriously just take up two pages talking about what's easier to kill a tiger with, a belt or a nailclipper? LoL that's some Napolean Dynamite type shit.
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
i think it would be "badass" if ones headstone read "eaten by a tiger". now that would be badass. wanna buy a slingshot?
 

Reprogammed

Well-Known Member
I think it's pretty easy to assume at this point that someone out of the group provoked the shit out of Tatiana, and I stick to my previous point as to their deserving a good mauling.
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
they're trying to say it took the zoo 30 mins to call 911. yet the tiger only went 50 feet. it killed the first kid as soon as it jumped out. then it started on the other 2. i think in 30 mins time it would have killed all 3.
 

rev3la7ion

Well-Known Member
lmao yeah, they got what they deserved. Natural selection at its finest. Or potential Darwin Award winners?
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
"Cops Say He Confessed"

SAN FRANCISCO (Jan. 18) - One of the three victims of San Francisco Zoo tiger attack was intoxicated and admitted to yelling and waving at the animal while standing atop the railing of the big cat enclosure, police said in court documents filed Thursday.

Police say tiger mauling victim Paul Dhaliwal, seen leaving the Jan. 8 funeral of a friend who died in the attack, was drunk and had yelled at the Siberian tiger before the mauling. The animal escaped from its enclosure at the San Francisco Zoo on Christmas Day.

Paramedics carried mauling victim into a hospital Dec. 25. All three victims had alcohol and marijuana in their bloodstreams at the time of the attack, according to court documents. They taunted the tiger before its escape, authorities said.

An attorney for Sousa's father said Paul Dhaliwal told him the three stood on a railing near the edge of a moat around the tiger enclosure. "When they got down they heard a noise in the bushes, and the tiger was jumping out of the bushes on him (Paul Dhaliwal)," court documents said.

Paul Dhaliwal, 19, told the father of Carlos Sousa Jr., 17, who was killed, that the three yelled and waved at the tiger but insisted they never threw anything into its pen to provoke the cat, according to a search warrant affidavit obtained by the San Francisco Chronicle.

"As a result of this investigation, (police believe) that the tiger may have been taunted/agitated by its eventual victims," according to Inspector Valerie Matthews, who prepared the affidavit. Police believe that "this factor contributed to the tiger escaping from its enclosure and attacking its victims," she said.

Sousa's father, Carlos Sousa Sr., said Dhaliwal told him the three stood on a 3-foot-tall metal railing a few feet from the edge of the tiger moat. "When they got down they heard a noise in the bushes, and the tiger was jumping out of the bushes on him (Paul Dhaliwal)," the documents said.

Police found a partial shoe print that matched Paul Dhaliwal's on top of the railing, Matthews said in the documents.

The papers said Paul Dhaliwal told Sousa that no one was dangling his legs over the enclosure. Authorities believe the tiger leaped or climbed out of the enclosure, which had a wall 4 feet shorter than the recommended minimum.

The affidavit also cites multiple reports of a group of young men taunting animals at the zoo, the Chronicle reported.

Toxicology results for Dhaliwal showed that his blood alcohol level was 0.16 - twice the legal limit for driving, according to the affidavit. His 24-year-old brother, Kulbir, and Sousa also had alcohol in their blood but within the legal limit, Matthews wrote.

All three also had marijuana in their systems, Matthews said. Kulbir Dhaliwal told police that the three had smoked pot and each had "a couple shots of vodka" before leaving San Jose for the zoo on Christmas Day, the affidavit said.

Police found a small amount of marijuana in Kulbir Dhaliwal's 2002 BMW, which the victims rode to the zoo, as well as a partially filled bottle of vodka, according to court documents.

Zoo spokesman Sam Singer said he had not seen the documents but believed the victims did taunt the animal, even though they claim they hadn't.

"Those brothers painted a completely different picture to the public and the press," Singer said. "Now it's starting to come out that what they said is not true."

Copyright 2007 The Associated Press
 

Dubbuh

Well-Known Member
haha, i agree i think the peices of shit got what they deserved, provoking the tiger. shows all the other stupid fucks in this country that do shit like that at the zoo to think twice.

but no matter what i think its kinda bull shit, that tiger shouldnt of been able to get out no matter what, the big thing is because of this a tiger's dead. pisses me off that these dumb fucks are gonna get a huge settlement outta this.

how bad would that suck, having a tiger comeing after you.

wish they had this on tape.
 

highs149

Active Member
yea..they def had it comin to them but it still shouldn't of been able to get out that easily...c'mon now...the bushes??????
 
Top