These are questions you should have asked yourself. How do I know what I saw was real? .
I highly doubt that what I saw was an illusion. I just know it was real because I saw it, unless I was tripping off of nothing. But if I was tripping off of nothing (I dont take hallucinogenics) than why wouldnt I see anything else out of the ordinary that day or any day for that matter? Why would My eyes be "tripping" just in one little spot on top of My neighbors roof? I didnt see anything strange anywhere else. Just that one spot that I was focusing the BB gun on. Never in My whole life have I seen anything like it before or since. The only other real crazy thing I saw was the UFOs in July 2 of 2012 or about a month prior to seeing the being.
It is the question ANYONE who has an extraordinary subjective experience needs to ask themselves..
Why is it subjective? It might seem subjective to you but objective to Me.
You shouldn't be here to answer questions, you should be here to ask questions that would help you establish that what you saw was not a mistake of perception, memory and logic..
Right, but I'm 100% sure that I saw a being, but you guys just want 100% proof too. I cant help give you evidence that I dont have. I would bet My life that there was a being there.
You should be inquiring about the ways of self deception. What you have done is skip over that question and give yourself a pass, but that is not a decision you can make for the rest of us. Rather than establish that you had any sort of real experience, you have only demonstrated that you do not know how to properly navigate reality, which is why you are often asked if you are taking your medication. It's not what you saw that makes you seem foolish, it's how you react to skepticism.
Do you believe I was decieved? I dont.
I know that its a crazy notion to propose, that I saw an alien. But I dont know how else to describe what I saw. It doesnt matter to Me if you guys beleive Me or not because it doesnt change what I saw. What else could it have been? The only other option I could think that it could potentially be is a human wearing a high tech "invisibility suit" that was working for the government.
Yeah, you are learning a little about epistemology. You have in your own way, applied the lesson, 'extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."
No one doubts the existence of animals or Kid Rock. They are both real, verifiable things.
Right.
So far, we have no evidence that such a thing as aliens and invisibility suits exist.
I guess your right, WE dont have emperical evidence of aliens (but maybe the government does), but I do believe we have invisibility suits. The only invisibility technology that I have even seen in person was that being, but I have seen it online. I posted some videos in this thread.
You have claimed to have seen something, but even you have admitted you are not sure what it was, it could have been a human in some high-tech camouflage suit, right? .
Thats right. It could have been some human in a high tech camouflage suit, BUT it wasnt camouflage like snipers use. It was NOT a type of ghillie suit. It was something totally different than a ghillie suit. It could let light pass right through. It was completely invisible at first, even though I was looking at him with a 4 power scope from about 15 yards away. Than it made a "face" that I drew in the youtube video, with 2 eyes of letting light pass through. Than it was letting all sorts of circles of light splash through at random, but always on the "forhead" of the "face". Than that "face" went away and I saw the translucent being. It looked a little like the picture I posted from the movie Predator, the invisible alien.
In fact, you never actually saw someone remove the suit so you don't know it was actually a suit to begin with, it could have been an undiscovered animal. .
You make a very good point, I NEVER actually saw the being take of the suit so it COULD have not been a suit if he was born that way. It could have been an undiscovered animal, and it might very well be, but it was humanoid from what I saw. I can only ASSUME it was an alien because I dont know.
Since you never actually got to examine this suit or being and learn more about it, it is also possible that what you saw was not what you think you saw. Our brains fool us all of the time, I don't know why you are so resistant to accepting this fact.
Thats right, I never touched the suit or the being. I was inside of My house, laying/sitting on the bed, looking out a window to the adjacent houses roof. I know that I get fooled sometimes and My mind plays tricks on Me sometimes but do you think I would know this much detail if it didnt happen? What good would it do Me to type all this out just to play a trick on you guys? It seems like I'm the only one that getting laughed at anyways and I dont think its funny.
If I told you I had bacon and eggs for breakfast, you probably would accept that since I have no reason to lie about it, but you have to accept the possibility that I am lying or that I forgot and really had the bacon and eggs yesterday but my brain switched the days on me. Did you know that every time we remember something and recall the details of events that occurred to us in the past that our brains actually reform new neural connections? What this means is that our memories are malleable which also makes them extremely fallible. The exact version of events that actually occurred about seeing the figure on the roof is almost certainly not what you currently remember. So not only do you not have any evidence to show us, you don't have the evidence to prove to yourself what it was you saw. If you can't be sure what you saw, why the hell should we just accept the first explanation that you came up with, that it was an alien in an invisibility suit?
I dont remember every detail of what I saw that day because My brain doesnt record like a video camera does, but I do remember lots of it and I'm being very honest as to what I saw. It was some kind of person, human or alien, that has the best invisibility technology. It might have been an animal but arent humans animals too?
You guys dont need to believe Me, but I'm going to tell the truth, to the best of My abilities. I cant convince anyone, but no one can convince Me that I didnt see that being that had the ability to be invisible and translucent. But I'm just going to say that he (or she) was wearing, what I call, an invisibilty suit. But your right, I dont know if it was a suit or if the creature was born like that but I'm going to call it a suit because I dont know any animals that are similar.
~PEACE~
