You gave me a argument based on AVERAGE lengths of the pyramid.
When the sides of the pyramids are not equal, what else was I supposed to do? The whole argument was built around the difference in circumference of two circles created using the measurements of the base. Since it is not a perfect square it is impossible to create a circle that touches each corner, likewise with the inside circle. The margin of error is over a decimeter no matter how you decide to create the circles. That error gets compounded since you need to calculate two different circumferences of circles whose diameters vary by as much as 10cm. The resultant figure cannot be significantly precise since it can be a range of numbers, for example, 299.24 to 299.89. This number cannot be resolved to any accuracy past 3 digits, i.e. 299, making any claim that it is equal to the speed of light in m/s extremely sketchy since it's no more correct than the number 300 at that level of precision. Period, end of story. Unless you can demonstrate where I am in error, your dismissing of this analysis is merely hand waving. I have attempted to be fair and explain this in detail so that you can explain where I'm wrong but I'm beginning to think you can't even understand the math since your rebuttal so far has been nothing more than "nuh uh." If you think I'm being unfair to the claim, then show me instead of just try to insult me.
This video is more informational than your current knowledge of the pyramids. Im guessing you accept that the pyramids were built by a primitive civilization with no use of technology, and that their sole purpose was for tombs for big-headed dictating Egyptians right?
It doesn't matter why I think they were built. I need no such information to analyze the claim that was made in the video that only had to do with math and the speed of light. Here you are again, trying to shift to another topic because the one I am addressing is either too complex for you to understand or you realize you have no good way to counter the math.
Theres NO evidence supporting that at all, they see mummies and assume its sole purpose is for tombs...
Strawman. You are creating a position for your opponents and attacking that even though no one here has made such a claim. I personally believe that the pyramids were more than just tombs and so do most Egyptologists. Your use of the word primitive is very telling considering that most scholars understand the Egyptians were a very advanced culturally and technologically, for their time period. You seem to be the one that wants to paint the people with a broad brush of ignorance and backwards, not me.
The presence of technology is undeniable, large perfect holes with grooves in them should clearly show some sort of technology was used.
No one is denying technology. What we are denying is advanced technology that they should not have had access to.
Not to mention the multi-ton blocks that we probably couldnt move in the amount of time they did. Also the Great pyramids position to North to such an accuracy that we would find it challenging to replicate.
The fact that we can measure the error in arcminutes means we wouldn't have any real problem replicating and even besting their alignment.... significantly. However, true north was easily and routinely measured by ancient astronomers using the stars, and we know they paid a high level of attention to and worshiped the starx. True north can also be accuralely calculated with a stick in the ground and being able to measure circles and angles, just like a modern surveyor. This is not the mystery you make it out to be.
The eight section design of the great pyramid only becomes visible to the naked eye for like an hour to signify the solstices. And the presence of Pi and the Golden Number comes up WAY to often for it to be a coincidence. Yes yes, Im sure if you analyse a few objects you are bound to find Pi or the Golden Number but BOTH pop up way too many times in the architecture of these buildings.
More vague opinon. How many is too many? What if pi was intended to be represented? Read something from a real mathematician, like
http://www.math.washington.edu/~greenber/PiPyr.html
There's good explanations for why phi is represented in some of the pyramids, both on purpose and accident.
Also the Pyramidian (which is thought to be the top of one of the pyramids) is exactly ONE METER HIGH, but surely it must be an accident as well, right?
So he missing pyramidion is 1 meter exactly? You're claims continue to get more outlandish. I would love to know how you calculate the height of something you can't measure....because IT'S MISSING!
It also explains how they knew how to measure time in seconds.
You will have to explain how you got to that conclusion from anything you just said. A day is not an abstract time period. However, dividing it up into 24 parts, each with 60 parts and each of those with 60, IS ARBITRARY and wasn't introduced as a time keeping method until fairly recently. How do you know they didn't divide the day into 10 equal segments or 100? Where's your proof our unit of time we call a second would have any meaning to a civilation living 5000 years ago or even an advanced race of ETs that would hardly know how we keep time in the 20th century?
So a building that no architect or technology can replicate,
Complete bullshit and a slap in the face of every architect and engineer alive today. Do you realize how massive and intricate the Large Hadron Collider is? Do you understand the tolerances for this machine is measured in micrometers? The Giza Pyramid had errors a magnitude of over a million times this?
that has Pi and the Golden Number built into the design too many times to count, thats positioned to north to such a degree that we would find it a challenge to do the same, a building composed of multi-ton blocks of different shape and size in order make it earthquake proof, such a building was built with a rock and chisel and man power? Gimme a break man!
No break will be given to unsupported blatherings.
