Fox News vs Rollitup.org - what's the difference?

Big P

Well-Known Member
ya all this talk just gonna make me round up even more people to vote against this little bitch obama, hands in a knot


hes gonna be a lame duck when we get through with him boys
 

CrackerJax

New Member
Obama will be a lame duck after November. He will either have to do a "clinton" (abandon all plans and run to the middle), or have gridlock for his remaining two years.

This is why there is such a push on major issues.... the deadline which seemed to be in 4 years, has turned into 2 years.... by their own hand no less! :lol: It's hysterical.... never has a party come in with such strength and completely blown it!!! Funny...but sad for the country. The ppl deserve better. Better is coming folks.... soon.

Not a solution.... but anything will be an improvement. Cracker LOVES gridlock!!! The citizens BEST protection!
 

doc111

Well-Known Member
i am gonna laugh when this 'republican' takeback doesn't happen.

and if you can say that anyone who doesn't support israel is an antisemite, then I can
say that if you don't support obama then you are a racist. it makes as much sense.
and if racism is a result of ignorance then it follows that if you don't support obama
you are not only a racist, but also ignorant. hurray!

on another note: cracker joined two months before i did, yet it says he has approx. 20,600 more posts than i do. how is this possible?
The party in power always loses seats in the midterms..............always! How many they will lose remains to be seen. It has been a long time since the country has been so divided. Regardless of what network's news you watch or what polls you've seen, the reality is that a lot of people oppose obamacare. Some of fhe polls show a slight majority oppose it. Some show a slight majority in favor. Either way you slice it is bad for the dems. Thank your glorious leader for that sad fact.:-( This sort of massive legislation being passed in the manner it was angered a lot of constituents. They won't forget so quickly. Even if obamacare is the wonderful fix that the progressives claim, nobody will see any benefit before the elections so heads are gonna roll!

As for Cracker having way more posts than you.............he obviously spends more time on here than you. Duh!:dunce:
 

IAm5toned

Well-Known Member
its a conspiracy... Cracker is actually an imprisoned alien, in area51. since obama wants to cut mmilitary funding for R&D, they put Cracker on here to drum up anti obama support, in exchange for time served, :lol:
 
Glenn Beck, and Sean Hannity speak with cold hard facts. They show video and/or record quotes giving proof of what this current administration's real agenda is.

There's no arguing with facts and quotes
You know I was going to refute this but then I realized that it's a quote, and you can't argue with a quote! Spoken like a true Fox News viewer. [Edit: That's not fair, even I watch Fox News occasionally to keep tabs on them, not everyone that watches Fox News' programming is an idiot, but that doesn't mean the opposite's true either.]
 

IAm5toned

Well-Known Member
The party in power always loses seats in the midterms..............always! How many they will lose remains to be seen. It has been a long time since the country has been so divided. Regardless of what network's news you watch or what polls you've seen, the reality is that a lot of people oppose obamacare. Some of fhe polls show a slight majority oppose it. Some show a slight majority in favor. Either way you slice it is bad for the dems. Thank your glorious leader for that sad fact.:-( This sort of massive legislation being passed in the manner it was angered a lot of constituents. They won't forget so quickly. Even if obamacare is the wonderful fix that the progressives claim, nobody will see any benefit before the elections so heads are gonna roll!

As for Cracker having way more posts than you.............he obviously spends more time on here than you. Duh!:dunce:
very true. alot of people on here are too young to remember or ignorant of the fact that national healthcare was originated by ted kennedy in the 70's, as his ticket to a presidential election, via the votes of the poor who had no insurance at the time.... wait.. that sounds awfully familair, doesnt it?
who says history doesnt repeat itself!?!
the sad thing was, if ted k couldnt do it,(pass healthcare, not get to the presidency) with his connections.. obama was fucked before he even thought of running on a healthcare/change ticket.
maybe he knew it anyway... who knows? not I, nor you
 

Near

Active Member
there not patriots... there simply self glorifying there current anti obama stance. i really hope you were leaning towards sarcasm with that comment...
God, you're so dense. I was being extremely sarcastic, it couldn't have been more clear.

I didnt. the word never appeared in my post. was there suggestions leaning towards that? possibly, if thats how YOU chose to interpret it. but please dont put words in my mouth. thats whats called libel. you could get sued for it in lots of places.
I didn't put any words in your mouth. I was obviously responding to what the protesters think, and I made that clear. I'm pretty sure you can't sue someone because of your own inability to read properly.


ever heard of hyperbole? from this statement, its apparent you havent.... get a clue man.
A very poor excuse. If you're going to state a ridiculous standard for "representation" then at least have the courage to stand by it.

call me stupid again, and i will take apart every post you have ever made on this site, and make it my personal business to expose every single flaw, every single error, and make sure you look like a fool.
You're stupid.

now that THAT is out of the way, let me elaborate on the intentions of my original post, to ease tempers a bit.
my opening stateent about representation was meant to convey the fact that, the vast majority of the american public feels as if they are NOT represented properly by there elected officials. take a survey yourself, ask your friends, neighbors, family members, and even a random stranger or 2. ask them if they feel like they are represented accurately by there elected officials... the amount of money it takes to get elected to high office is a solid barrier to all but the people with very deep pockets. its nice being wealthy, but it takes hard work. so much work in fact that most people in those positions are completely out of touch with what most americans face on a daily basis.
THATS what i meant... i used an inflammatory statement to provoke images... aka hyperbole.
to even insinuate that i beleive the nation should conduct polls on every legislative issue, is completely naive.
Ease tempers? You're the one that seems worked up, not me.

I'm well aware that a majority of Americans would say that elected officials are not in line with their own beliefs, which is quite comical since they're the ones who elect them. But that is another issue entirely, you're conflating two very different senses of the word "represented". What the tea party protesters claim is that they are not being represented in the sense of the British colonists before the Revolutionary War. That is why they wave the Gadsden flag and use the slogan "No taxation without representation". And of course there's the fact that "Tea Party" is a reference to the Boston Tea Party. What you and these protesters don't realize is that there's a massive distinction between having no representation(in the case of British colonists) and having elected officials that you didn't vote for and disagree with(in the case of the tea party protesters and Obama).
 

medicineman

New Member
ok well... the thing is when you get into governmental interventions more often than not we see failures. IMO a truly free market without federal regulations would improve competition in nearly all markets. the problem is that governmental intervention has allowed the corporate few to rape its customers while widespread dissidense is occuring. In a truly free market any company that is prercieved as rapind its clients or even a slight taking of advantage would be discarded and ultimately deemed unprofitable further deturring others form attempting to take advantage of customers. You have to realise that half of your purchases are based on experience or second hand experience from a customer. If people are unhappy with a service the void will be filled with some one else looking to make money. thats why a free market works. it actively protects itself from unnecessary cost spikes and unsavory characters. in any form of gov't there will always be the 1% that controls 80% of the wealth. only in a true free market are those people recognized as crooks and expose their pitfalls hoping to encourage competition... rant and rant some more i will... yoda i am...
I'd sure like to see some credulous back up to this rant. In my humble opinion, the exact opposite does occur. If left un-regulated, IE the Massey mine fiasco for example, capitalists would stop at nothing to expand their profits at everyone elses expense. Pretty much how the world works now with very few exceptions, unless a government regulator steps in and halts their idiocy. Believe it or not, government has a role to play in society, and stopping unfettered greed at the workers expense, or the consumers expense (Tainted food products, lead in toys etc.) is a key role.
 

CrackerJax

New Member
Yes, cutting back everyone's potential to make $$$ for themselves always makes a country stronger. Uh huh.....

Better seal off the borders at some point...because the TRUE producers are going to leave you with ur high ideals.
 

Patrick Bateman

Active Member
The funny thing about this all is that the right wing deity Ronald Reagan enjoyed almost the exact same ratings as Obama up to this point

Reagan, who cut taxes in the top bracket from 70% to 28% over 7 years, increased the national debt from $700 million to $3 trillion.

During the Recession of 1982, the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act was enacted - a 3 year $100 billion tax hike, the largest since WW2

Excise taxes on cigarettes doubled and those on telephone services tripled - temporarily

In December 1982, the unemployment rate stood at 10.8%

2 years later, thanks to deficit spending and lowered interest rates, all the angry people forgot about the recession and Ronny was re-elected

The End
 

doc111

Well-Known Member
The funny thing about this all is that the right wing deity Ronald Reagan enjoyed almost the exact same ratings as Obama up to this point

Reagan, who cut taxes in the top bracket from 70% to 28% over 7 years, increased the national debt from $700 million to $3 trillion.

During the Recession of 1982, the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act was enacted - a 3 year $100 billion tax hike, the largest since WW2

Excise taxes on cigarettes doubled and those on telephone services tripled - temporarily

In December 1982, the unemployment rate stood at 10.8%

2 years later, thanks to deficit spending and lowered interest rates, all the angry people forgot about the recession and Ronny was re-elected

The End
[youtube]BHq2gwoYphw[/youtube]
 

medicineman

New Member
Yes, cutting back everyone's potential to make $$$ for themselves always makes a country stronger. Uh huh.....

Better seal off the borders at some point...because the TRUE producers are going to leave you with ur high ideals.
Uhhh, you mean wall street thieves like you?? I say good riddance. Make money profiteering illegal. What is it that wall street boys really do?? Oh that's right, they make money right out of thin air. They bet the market will go up, then short it on the way down. Gambling with everyones money. Like the "Bailout", they make money when it's good, and when it's bad, we the peoiple bail their asses out. They got bonuses??? they should have been shot.
 

IAm5toned

Well-Known Member
Uhhh, you mean wall street thieves like you?? I say good riddance. Make money profiteering illegal. What is it that wall street boys really do?? Oh that's right, they make money right out of thin air. They bet the market will go up, then short it on the way down. Gambling with everyones money. Like the "Bailout", they make money when it's good, and when it's bad, we the peoiple bail their asses out. They got bonuses??? they should have been shot.
you sound like a stalininst.
 

CrackerJax

New Member
Keep reading abc and usa today..... sigh.... you need some sources son.

Obama came in on the high....and has slipped ever since. Reagan had a Democrat controlled Congress and media against him.... Obama has the OPPOSITE. Obama has gotten EVERYTHING he has wanted and to great media fanfare.... and no one CARES.... Obama cannot stop the slide no matter what he says.... and the more he talks, the less ppl believe him.

He's certainly no Reagan.... there may be some number alignment...but the context behind those numbers couldn't be farther apart.

Also, Obama is the most divisive President I have have been around. he is constantly talking trash in public...assailing ppl and industries....like a Chavez. Look back at ANY President and try and find one that talked anything like Obama.

He has no class. A President leaves that to others. A president is supposed to represent ALL the ppl. Obama LOVES to single ppl out..... shallow.

The ppl are done with him (taxpayers only of course, not the hobos)....they are done with Congress.

Foreign policy is in tatters after a year....allies no longer trust us....our enemies no longer fear us....they see the weakness....everyone does. Iran will have a missile capable of hitting the US around 2015.... not long. Obama has completely abdicated Iran. he will abdicate Afghanistan too.... just wait.

I could put up a mighty list.... but what's the point now? Congress will be shaken up completely soon....and Obama will be out in 2 years.... then the country can rebuild...and repeal the damage...it will take years to undue...but it will be done, if not....we will be the biggest banana republic ever. A fine legacy for Obama.
 
Top