skywalker707
Member
Here you go cheese.. again more pinene in organic, and more caryophyllene in hydro.
Here you go cheese.. again more pinene in organic, and more caryophyllene in hydro.
I am saying if breeders who grow and created strains like wedding cake, girl scout cookies, permanent marker, ect. ect.. did it with synthetics and got famous all over the industry with these strains and i repeat did it perfectly with synthetics. Then these strains do better with synthetics.. In flavour, taste, potency.. Organic growers won't be able to reproduce the terpenes that made these very strains famous with organics.. As i clearly shown you limonene, myrcene and caryophyllene are higher in synthetic grows than organics grows with the same strain grown from clones.. Thats why strains that got famous because of these terpenes will in general perform better with synthetic nutes than organic nutes.. On the other hand organics increase more different terpenes.. The strains that become famous thanks to these terpenes in organic type of grows, created by breeders widely known to grow organically like DJ Short, Soma, Bodhi, Humboldt Seed Company, Gage Green Group, Mandala will perform better in organic grow. What is so hard to understand here? I already repeated the same thing 5 times and you still don't get it..It's possible that what you are describing has to do with selection by the breeder based on the expression of pheno types when grown with synthetic nutrients vs organic. It sounds like(and correct me if I'm wrong) what you are positting is that when strains are bred by breeders who were using organic growing methods the resulting seed sock produces higher potency better tasting buds when they grown using organic inputs and vise versa regarding seeds produced by breeders who use synthetics.
If a strain expresses different pheno types when grown using synthetic fertilizers(or vise versa) and the breeder selects towards a pheno type that occurs while using synthetics then it seems reasonable that if someone buys that strain that person might not get a plant with the same expression/pheno type that the breeder bred towards if they grow it using organics.
Not to contradict you, just having fun theorizing why what you claim could be true.
I am saying some strains can grow better with synthetics, others not. People like Capulator the creator of Mac, prove it. People like Seed Junky Genetics with Jealosy, Permanent Marker and Wedding cake proved it. People like Cookies Fam with their creation of Girl Scout Cookies Proved it.Alright, let me get this straight... Are you guys saying that ANY/EVERY synthetic line will get you the results you are talking about?
So… General Hydro, Botanicare, Fox Farm, Jacks, Maxigro, Dynagro ,Veg/Bloom, Cutting Edge, NPK, Dutch Pro, Flora Flex, Athena Ag, Canna, House & Garden, RX Green, Current Culture, Emerald Harvest, Heavy-16, Rock Nutrients, Advanced Nutrients, Cyco, Mills pays the bills and Miracle Grow will all give you the same results?? Same cannabinoids?? Same terpene profiles?? Same Flavors?? From the same plant??
I’m probably missing more than half of the popular options.
How long have you guys been growing again??
This should be good.![]()
I'm curious about results in Organic vs Synthetic nutrients. I always eat organic when I can and was thinking maybe herb should be the same way.
I'm really interested in results. I know yield goes down with organics, but by how much?
Thanks!
I am saying some strains can grow better with synthetics, others not. People like Capulator the creator of Mac, prove it. People like Seed Junky Genetics with Jealosy, Permanent Marker and Wedding cake proved it. People like Cookies Fam with their creation of Girl Scout Cookies Proved it.
I am not discounting organics i already mentioned some strains do better with organics. Blueberry, Amnesia Haze, Blueberry Muffin, Vanilla Frosting, Landraces, Many old school sativa varieties, old school indicas. Almost everything in which the predominant top 3 terpenes are not myrcene, limonene and caryophyllene which are more abundant in synthetic grows. I already shown you diagrams of the same strains grown from clonings producing more or less from different terpenes. Why you didn't stick to the science? And the clear examples of the strains that dominate the market for the last 5-10 years? To see that most of them were created using synthetic nutes, by growers that can grow just as good as organic growers and often get even better terpene profiles for certain strains??